AMZN vs MAT
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
Amazon exhibits stable financial health with a Piotroski F-Score of 6/9, though it trades at a massive premium compared to its Graham Number ($78.61) and Intrinsic Value ($103.97). While the company demonstrates exceptional operational execution with 4/4 recent earnings beats and strong ROE (22.29%), the valuation is stretched. This fundamental strength is currently countered by bearish insider sentiment and a very weak technical trend score (10/100), suggesting a potential short-term disconnect between long-term value and immediate price action.
Mattel exhibits strong deterministic health with a Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 and robust liquidity ratios, yet it is trapped in a bearish technical trend. While the stock is fundamentally cheap with a P/E of 11.83 and trades very close to its Graham Number ($14.44), significant earnings contraction (-18.50% YoY) and a string of quarterly misses create a growth headwind. The disconnect between strong balance sheet health and declining profitability suggests a value trap risk unless earnings stabilize. Overall, the company is a stable value play with poor short-term momentum.
Compare Another Pair
Related Comparisons
AMZN vs MAT: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) and Mattel, Inc. (MAT) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.