No connection

Search Results

AMZN vs MAT

AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc.
NEUTRAL
Price
$263.04
Market Cap
$2.83T
Sector
Consumer Cyclical
AI Confidence
85%
MAT
Mattel, Inc.
NEUTRAL
Price
$14.79
Market Cap
$4.47B
Sector
Consumer Cyclical
AI Confidence
80%

Valuation

P/E Ratio
AMZN
36.69
MAT
11.83
Forward P/E
AMZN
27.82
MAT
9.74
P/B Ratio
AMZN
6.87
MAT
2.0
P/S Ratio
AMZN
3.95
MAT
0.84
EV/EBITDA
AMZN
19.78
MAT
7.83

Profitability

Gross Margin
AMZN
50.29%
MAT
48.87%
Operating Margin
AMZN
10.53%
MAT
7.86%
Profit Margin
AMZN
10.83%
MAT
7.43%
ROE
AMZN
22.29%
MAT
17.68%
ROA
AMZN
6.93%
MAT
5.56%

Growth

Revenue Growth
AMZN
13.6%
MAT
7.3%
Earnings Growth
AMZN
5.0%
MAT
-18.5%

Financial Health

Debt/Equity
AMZN
0.43
MAT
1.2
Current Ratio
AMZN
1.05
MAT
2.15
Quick Ratio
AMZN
0.84
MAT
1.6

Dividends

Dividend Yield
AMZN
--
MAT
--
Payout Ratio
AMZN
0.0%
MAT
0.0%

AI Verdict

AMZN NEUTRAL

Amazon exhibits stable financial health with a Piotroski F-Score of 6/9, though it trades at a massive premium compared to its Graham Number ($78.61) and Intrinsic Value ($103.97). While the company demonstrates exceptional operational execution with 4/4 recent earnings beats and strong ROE (22.29%), the valuation is stretched. This fundamental strength is currently countered by bearish insider sentiment and a very weak technical trend score (10/100), suggesting a potential short-term disconnect between long-term value and immediate price action.

Strengths
Consistent earnings outperformance with 4/4 recent beats and high average surprises (17.34%)
Strong profitability metrics including a 22.29% ROE and 50.29% gross margin
Conservative leverage with a Debt/Equity ratio of 0.43
Risks
Significant valuation gap between current price ($263.04) and deterministic fair value estimates
Bearish insider activity with $28.62M in net sales, including transactions by the CEO
Weak technical trend score (10/100) indicating potential momentum loss
MAT NEUTRAL

Mattel exhibits strong deterministic health with a Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 and robust liquidity ratios, yet it is trapped in a bearish technical trend. While the stock is fundamentally cheap with a P/E of 11.83 and trades very close to its Graham Number ($14.44), significant earnings contraction (-18.50% YoY) and a string of quarterly misses create a growth headwind. The disconnect between strong balance sheet health and declining profitability suggests a value trap risk unless earnings stabilize. Overall, the company is a stable value play with poor short-term momentum.

Strengths
Strong Piotroski F-Score (7/9) indicating high financial health
Attractive valuation with a P/E (11.83) significantly below sector average (34.03)
Excellent liquidity with a Current Ratio of 2.15 and Quick Ratio of 1.60
Risks
Negative earnings growth (-18.50% YoY and -24.60% Q/Q)
Poor earnings track record with only 1 beat in the last 4 quarters
Strongly bearish technical trend (0/100) and negative 6-month price performance (-23.1%)

Compare Another Pair

AMZN vs MAT: Head-to-Head Comparison

This page compares Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) and Mattel, Inc. (MAT) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.

Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.

Home
Terminal
AI Chat
Markets
Profile