No connection

Search Results

ANDG vs BABA

ANDG
Andersen Group Inc.
NEUTRAL
Price
$23.07
Market Cap
$2.56B
Sector
Consumer Cyclical
AI Confidence
68%
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
NEUTRAL
Price
$173.23
Market Cap
$413.56B
Sector
Consumer Cyclical
AI Confidence
65%

Valuation

P/E Ratio
ANDG
--
BABA
23.6
Forward P/E
ANDG
15.3
BABA
19.5
P/B Ratio
ANDG
--
BABA
2.71
P/S Ratio
ANDG
3.16
BABA
0.41
EV/EBITDA
ANDG
--
BABA
20.1

Profitability

Gross Margin
ANDG
27.83%
BABA
41.17%
Operating Margin
ANDG
41.27%
BABA
2.17%
Profit Margin
ANDG
6.91%
BABA
12.19%
ROE
ANDG
--
BABA
11.19%
ROA
ANDG
--
BABA
4.03%

Growth

Revenue Growth
ANDG
14.8%
BABA
4.8%
Earnings Growth
ANDG
--
BABA
-51.8%

Financial Health

Debt/Equity
ANDG
0.42
BABA
0.27
Current Ratio
ANDG
3.06
BABA
1.46
Quick Ratio
ANDG
2.77
BABA
0.84

Dividends

Dividend Yield
ANDG
--
BABA
0.59%
Payout Ratio
ANDG
0.0%
BABA
14.4%

AI Verdict

ANDG NEUTRAL

The Advanced Deterministic Scorecard shows strong financial health with a Piotroski F-Score of 7/9, indicating robust fundamentals. Despite missing Altman Z-Score and key valuation metrics, the company exhibits solid profitability, low leverage, and strong revenue growth. However, stagnant price performance over multiple timeframes and lack of dividend commitment temper optimism. Analysts recommend a 'buy' with a target price of $29.50, implying upside potential, but weak insider activity and technical trend raise caution.

Strengths
Strong Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 suggests high financial stability and quality earnings
Exceptionally high operating margin of 41.27%, significantly above sector average of 6.28%
Healthy balance sheet with low Debt/Equity ratio of 0.42 and strong liquidity (Current Ratio: 3.06)
Risks
Missing Altman Z-Score prevents full assessment of bankruptcy risk despite strong Piotroski
No available P/E, ROE, ROA, or cash flow data limits comprehensive valuation analysis
Price performance has been flat to negative: -1.8% over 1Y, -9.4% over 1M
BABA NEUTRAL

The Advanced Deterministic Scorecard reveals a mixed financial profile for Alibaba (BABA), with a weak Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 indicating suboptimal financial health, and no available Altman Z-Score limiting distress risk assessment. While valuation metrics appear favorable relative to peers—especially a Price/Sales of 0.41 and Forward P/E of 19.50—earnings growth is sharply negative (YoY EPS down 71%), and recent quarterly beats have reversed into consistent misses over the last four quarters. Strong insider sentiment and a bullish analyst consensus (strong_buy) contrast with deteriorating profitability and weak technical trends (10/100). The stock trades significantly above the Graham Number ($102.68) and intrinsic value estimate ($51.38), suggesting overvaluation unless growth rebounds materially.

Strengths
Attractive valuation multiples relative to sector: P/E (23.60) and Price/Sales (0.41) well below sector averages (Avg P/E: 49.05, Avg P/S: N/A but implied high)
Low debt burden with Debt/Equity of 0.27, well below sector average of 1.63, providing financial flexibility
Strong gross margin of 41.17%, reflecting pricing power and operational efficiency in core e-commerce
Risks
Weak Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 signals deteriorating financial health—penalizes health score per instructions
Earnings in freefall: YoY EPS growth down 71.0%, Q/Q down 70.4%, with last four quarters missing estimates by an average of -10.5%
Operating margin collapsed to 2.17%, indicating severe pressure in profitability despite stable gross margins

Compare Another Pair

ANDG vs BABA: Head-to-Head Comparison

This page compares Andersen Group Inc. (ANDG) and Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.

Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.

Home
Terminal
AI
Markets
Profile