AOS vs ASR
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
AOS exhibits mixed financial health with a weak Piotroski F-Score of 4/9, indicating borderline stability, and lacks an Altman Z-Score for distress risk assessment. Despite solid profitability metrics like a 28.21% ROE and 18.63% operating margin, the company faces headwinds from declining Q/Q EPS growth (-12.1%) and bearish insider activity. Valuation is stretched relative to Graham's defensive standard ($33.12) but aligns with growth-based intrinsic value ($106.35), while trading below analyst target ($78.27). The stock shows resilience in earnings beats over time, though recent deceleration and technical bearishness temper optimism.
ASR exhibits strong financial health with a Piotroski F-Score of 7/9, indicating solid operational and balance sheet strength. Profitability metrics are robust, with high margins and ROE above sector average, while leverage remains low. However, recent earnings declines and poor earnings surprise trends—four consecutive misses with double-digit negative surprises—raise concerns about near-term execution. The stock trades significantly above the Graham Number of $64.05, reflecting premium valuation despite weak earnings growth, though it aligns more closely with the growth-based intrinsic value of $181.09.
Compare Another Pair
Related Comparisons
AOS vs ASR: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares A. O. Smith Corporation (AOS) and Grupo Aeroportuario del Sureste, S. A. B. de C. V. (ASR) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.