No connection

Search Results

APPS vs GLOO

APPS
Digital Turbine, Inc.
BEARISH
Price
$3.56
Market Cap
$426.8M
Sector
Technology
AI Confidence
78%
GLOO
Gloo Holdings, Inc.
BEARISH
Price
$5.89
Market Cap
$476.3M
Sector
Technology
AI Confidence
85%

Valuation

P/E Ratio
APPS
--
GLOO
--
Forward P/E
APPS
5.7
GLOO
-14.37
P/B Ratio
APPS
2.19
GLOO
-0.11
P/S Ratio
APPS
0.79
GLOO
7.05
EV/EBITDA
APPS
8.22
GLOO
-11.96

Profitability

Gross Margin
APPS
47.87%
GLOO
24.13%
Operating Margin
APPS
14.32%
GLOO
-82.0%
Profit Margin
APPS
-9.08%
GLOO
-225.8%
ROE
APPS
-27.48%
GLOO
--
ROA
APPS
0.98%
GLOO
--

Growth

Revenue Growth
APPS
12.5%
GLOO
431.6%
Earnings Growth
APPS
--
GLOO
--

Financial Health

Debt/Equity
APPS
1.86
GLOO
--
Current Ratio
APPS
1.1
GLOO
0.82
Quick Ratio
APPS
1.03
GLOO
0.59

Dividends

Dividend Yield
APPS
--
GLOO
--
Payout Ratio
APPS
0.0%
GLOO
0.0%

AI Verdict

APPS BEARISH

Digital Turbine (APPS) exhibits weak financial health per the Piotroski F-Score of 2/9, indicating significant distress signals, and lacks an Altman Z-Score, which raises unquantified bankruptcy risk. Despite strong revenue growth (12.5% YoY) and a history of earnings beat consistency (90.88% average surprise), the company operates at a net loss (-9.08% profit margin) and has a high debt-to-equity ratio (1.86), undermining long-term sustainability. The stock trades at a forward P/E of 5.70, which appears attractive on the surface, but this is misleading given the negative earnings and lack of profitability. The 52-week price range ($2.11–$8.28) and recent 6-month decline of 22.9% reflect persistent market skepticism, while insider selling and a 5-year price drop of 95.8% further erode confidence.

Strengths
Consistent earnings beat history with 90.88% average surprise over last 4 quarters
Strong gross margin of 47.87% indicates pricing power and cost control
Positive Q/Q EPS growth of 20.0% and YoY EPS growth of 38.5% suggest improving profitability momentum
Risks
Piotroski F-Score of 2/9 indicates severe financial distress and weak operational health
Negative ROE (-27.48%) and ROA (0.98%) signal poor capital efficiency and declining shareholder value
Debt/Equity ratio of 1.86 is dangerously high, especially for a loss-making company
GLOO BEARISH

Gloo Holdings exhibits critical financial instability, highlighted by a weak Piotroski F-Score of 3/9 and a negative Price-to-Book ratio (-0.11), indicating negative shareholder equity. While the company shows explosive YoY revenue growth of 431.60%, this is offset by a severe profit margin of -225.80% and a current ratio of 0.82, signaling significant liquidity risk. The technical trend is entirely bearish, and the company has failed to meet earnings estimates in all available quarters. Despite an optimistic analyst target of $13.00, the fundamental health metrics suggest a high risk of capital impairment or dilution.

Strengths
Hyper-growth in revenue (431.60% YoY)
Significant upside gap to analyst target price ($13.00)
Operating within the high-scalability Software-Application industry
Risks
Negative equity (Price/Book -0.11) indicating insolvency risk
Severe lack of profitability (Profit Margin -225.80%)
Liquidity crunch with a Current Ratio of 0.82 and Quick Ratio of 0.59

Compare Another Pair

APPS vs GLOO: Head-to-Head Comparison

This page compares Digital Turbine, Inc. (APPS) and Gloo Holdings, Inc. (GLOO) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.

Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.

Home
Terminal
AI
Markets
Profile