AQN vs KEN
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
The deterministic health scores indicate significant concerns, with a Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 signaling borderline financial stability and no available Altman Z-Score limiting distress risk assessment. Despite a recent 1Y price surge of +47.5%, the stock trades at a steep valuation (P/E 91.14 vs sector avg 19.73) while reporting a negative profit margin (-1.11%) and an unsustainable dividend payout ratio (371.43%). However, strong operating metrics like 25.07% operating margin, improving EPS trends (+12.5% YoY), and a 4.06% dividend yield provide some support. The lack of insider activity and mixed analyst sentiment (hold) further justify a cautious stance.
Kenon Holdings exhibits a dangerous divergence between its market price and fundamental value, with a Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 indicating only stable health. The stock is severely overvalued, trading at $88.58 despite a Graham Number of $29.51 and an Intrinsic Value of $8.89. While revenue growth is robust, the collapse in earnings (-93.70%) and a catastrophic dividend payout ratio of 377.95% suggest a highly unsustainable financial structure. The current valuation appears driven by momentum rather than underlying profitability.
Compare Another Pair
Related Comparisons
AQN vs KEN: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp. (AQN) and Kenon Holdings Ltd. (KEN) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.