ARCC vs BEN
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
ARCC presents a conflicting profile: while it trades at a discount to book value (P/B 0.93) and below its Graham Number ($28.81), its fundamental health is deteriorating. The Piotroski F-Score of 2/9 indicates weak financial health, compounded by a concerning earnings decline of -24.90% YoY. Most critically, the dividend payout ratio of 103.23% suggests the current 10.32% yield is unsustainable without eroding capital or utilizing reserves. Despite analyst 'Buy' ratings, the combination of negative growth and poor deterministic health scores warrants a cautious approach.
Franklin Resources (BEN) shows a weak Piotroski F-Score of 4/9, indicating marginal financial health, and lacks an Altman Z-Score, limiting distress risk assessment. The stock trades above its Graham Number of $21.55 at a current price of $25.31, suggesting modest overvaluation for a defensive investor, though forward P/E of 9.02 implies improved earnings expectations. Strong dividend yield of 5.12% is offset by a concerning 140.66% payout ratio, raising sustainability questions. While recent earnings growth (YoY EPS +13.6%, Q/Q +36.7%) and beat rates are positive, weak profitability metrics like ROE (3.82%) and low insider activity temper optimism.
Compare Another Pair
Related Comparisons
ARCC vs BEN: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) and Franklin Resources, Inc. (BEN) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.