No connection

Search Results

AS vs BABA

AS
Amer Sports, Inc.
NEUTRAL
Price
$37.72
Market Cap
$20.92B
Sector
Consumer Cyclical
AI Confidence
72%
BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
NEUTRAL
Price
$173.23
Market Cap
$413.56B
Sector
Consumer Cyclical
AI Confidence
65%

Valuation

P/E Ratio
AS
66.18
BABA
23.6
Forward P/E
AS
32.32
BABA
19.5
P/B Ratio
AS
3.72
BABA
2.71
P/S Ratio
AS
3.43
BABA
0.41
EV/EBITDA
AS
25.59
BABA
20.1

Profitability

Gross Margin
AS
57.2%
BABA
41.17%
Operating Margin
AS
12.87%
BABA
2.17%
Profit Margin
AS
5.1%
BABA
12.19%
ROE
AS
6.63%
BABA
11.19%
ROA
AS
4.58%
BABA
4.03%

Growth

Revenue Growth
AS
29.7%
BABA
4.8%
Earnings Growth
AS
127.3%
BABA
-51.8%

Financial Health

Debt/Equity
AS
0.33
BABA
0.27
Current Ratio
AS
1.51
BABA
1.46
Quick Ratio
AS
0.68
BABA
0.84

Dividends

Dividend Yield
AS
--
BABA
0.59%
Payout Ratio
AS
0.0%
BABA
14.4%

AI Verdict

AS NEUTRAL

Amer Sports (AS) exhibits a weak Piotroski F-Score of 4/9, indicating marginal financial health, while the absence of an Altman Z-Score limits distress risk assessment. Despite strong revenue and earnings growth, elevated valuation metrics—particularly a P/E of 66.18 and Forward P/E of 32.32—suggest the stock is pricing in aggressive future expectations. Profitability margins are healthy, but liquidity concerns arise from a low quick ratio of 0.68, and the stock trades well above both the Graham Number ($11.41) and intrinsic value estimate ($16.81), implying limited margin of safety. Analysts are overwhelmingly bullish with a strong_buy consensus and a $47.43 target, yet technical trend and insider sentiment remain weak.

Strengths
Exceptional year-over-year earnings growth of 127.3% and Q/Q EPS surge of +766.7%
Strong revenue growth at 29.7% YoY, significantly above sector average of 7.81%
High gross margin of 57.20%, reflecting pricing power and efficient cost control
Risks
Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 indicates weak to stable financial health, raising concerns about balance sheet and earnings quality
Quick ratio of 0.68 suggests potential short-term liquidity pressure despite a current ratio of 1.51
Valuation appears stretched with P/E of 66.18, significantly above sector average of 50.28 and Forward P/E still high at 32.32
BABA NEUTRAL

The Advanced Deterministic Scorecard reveals a mixed financial profile for Alibaba (BABA), with a weak Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 indicating suboptimal financial health, and no available Altman Z-Score limiting distress risk assessment. While valuation metrics appear favorable relative to peers—especially a Price/Sales of 0.41 and Forward P/E of 19.50—earnings growth is sharply negative (YoY EPS down 71%), and recent quarterly beats have reversed into consistent misses over the last four quarters. Strong insider sentiment and a bullish analyst consensus (strong_buy) contrast with deteriorating profitability and weak technical trends (10/100). The stock trades significantly above the Graham Number ($102.68) and intrinsic value estimate ($51.38), suggesting overvaluation unless growth rebounds materially.

Strengths
Attractive valuation multiples relative to sector: P/E (23.60) and Price/Sales (0.41) well below sector averages (Avg P/E: 49.05, Avg P/S: N/A but implied high)
Low debt burden with Debt/Equity of 0.27, well below sector average of 1.63, providing financial flexibility
Strong gross margin of 41.17%, reflecting pricing power and operational efficiency in core e-commerce
Risks
Weak Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 signals deteriorating financial health—penalizes health score per instructions
Earnings in freefall: YoY EPS growth down 71.0%, Q/Q down 70.4%, with last four quarters missing estimates by an average of -10.5%
Operating margin collapsed to 2.17%, indicating severe pressure in profitability despite stable gross margins

Compare Another Pair

Related Comparisons

AMZN vs AS
AS vs TSLA
AS vs HD
AS vs TM

AS vs BABA: Head-to-Head Comparison

This page compares Amer Sports, Inc. (AS) and Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.

Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.

AS Full Analysis BABA Full Analysis Stock Screener
Features Terminal AI Assistant Analysis Market News Pricing
Start Trading with AI Already have an account? Sign In
Home
Terminal
AI
Markets
Profile