ASM vs BHP
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
ASM presents a paradoxical profile with a stable Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 and exceptional balance sheet health, yet it trades at a significant premium to its Graham Number ($2.35) and Intrinsic Value ($5.02). While YoY earnings growth is explosive (82.90%) and margins are robust, the company has failed to beat earnings estimates in the last four consecutive quarters with a severe average surprise of -30.56%. The stark contrast between the 'Strong Buy' analyst consensus and the bearish technical trend/poor earnings track record suggests a high-risk growth play dependent on future production targets rather than current execution.
BHP's Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 indicates stable financial health, but the absence of an Altman Z-Score limits distress risk assessment. The stock trades significantly above its Graham Number of $27.35 and intrinsic value of $24.78, reflecting a substantial premium. Despite strong profitability metrics like 37.7% operating margin and 21.99% ROE, earnings and revenue growth are sharply negative year-over-year. Analysts consensus is a hold with a $57.00 target, below current price, suggesting limited upside.
Compare Another Pair
Related Comparisons
ASM vs BHP: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares Avino Silver & Gold Mines Ltd. (ASM) and BHP Group Limited (BHP) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.