ATLO vs HRZN
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
Ames National Corporation (ATLO) shows a mixed financial profile with a weak Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 indicating marginal financial health, and no available Altman Z-Score limits distress risk assessment. The stock trades below its growth-based intrinsic value of $52.80 but above the conservative Graham Number of $30.14, suggesting moderate undervaluation with quality concerns. Strong profitability metrics like a 26.46% profit margin and 37.88% operating margin are offset by weak returns on equity and assets (ROE: 8.35%, ROA: 0.76%) and a bearish technical trend. Earnings and revenue growth are robust year-over-year, but historical earnings misses and lack of analyst coverage raise caution.
HRZN exhibits severe financial deterioration, highlighted by a weak Piotroski F-Score of 2/9 and a bearish technical trend of 0/100. While the stock trades at a discount to book value (P/B 0.65), this is offset by negative revenue growth (-12.20%) and a catastrophic dividend payout ratio of 224.56%. The company is effectively paying out more than it earns, signaling an imminent dividend cut. Despite a modest analyst target of $5.50, the fundamental trajectory is sharply negative.
Compare Another Pair
Related Comparisons
ATLO vs HRZN: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares Ames National Corporation (ATLO) and Horizon Technology Finance Corporation (HRZN) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.