ATMU vs MAT
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
The company exhibits weak financial health with a Piotroski F-Score of 3/9, indicating significant concerns in profitability, leverage, and operating efficiency. Despite this, Atmus shows strong profitability metrics including an ROE of 71.52% and solid revenue and earnings growth, supported by a bullish analyst recommendation and consistent earnings beats. Valuation is rich relative to Graham’s defensive standard ($14.97 vs. current price of $56.55), but growth expectations justify a premium. However, bearish insider activity and high leverage temper optimism, creating a mixed outlook.
Mattel exhibits a strong deterministic health profile with a Piotroski F-Score of 7/9, indicating robust operational efficiency and financial stability. However, this fundamental strength is offset by a severe bearish technical trend (0/100) and concerning earnings decay, with YoY earnings growth at -18.50%. While the stock is priced near its Graham Number ($14.38), suggesting fair value from a defensive standpoint, the divergence between revenue growth (+7.30%) and earnings contraction suggests significant margin pressure. The outlook remains neutral as the low valuation provides a floor, but the lack of earnings momentum prevents a bullish rating.
Compare Another Pair
Related Comparisons
ATMU vs MAT: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares Atmus Filtration Technologies Inc. (ATMU) and Mattel, Inc. (MAT) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.