ATO vs CNP
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
ATO exhibits a mixed financial profile with a Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 indicating stable but not strong financial health, and no available Altman Z-Score limits distress risk assessment. The stock trades above its Graham Number of $118.68 at $165.34, reflecting a premium valuation, though below the growth-based intrinsic value of $220.07. Strong profitability metrics like a 25.49% profit margin and 30.70% operating margin contrast with weak liquidity (Current Ratio: 0.77) and bearish technical trend. Analysts consensus is 'hold' with a target price of $177.55, implying modest upside, while insider activity shows slight selling pressure.
CNP presents a conflict between strong historical performance and current overvaluation. The deterministic baseline is weak, with a Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 (Stable) and a current price of $42.47 that significantly exceeds both the Graham Number ($25.03) and Intrinsic Value ($27.79). While the company maintains healthy operating margins and a sustainable dividend payout, the high Debt/Equity ratio (2.16) and bearish technical trend (10/100) suggest limited immediate upside. The stock is currently trading at a premium that is not fully supported by its low revenue growth (1.90%).
Compare Another Pair
Related Comparisons
ATO vs CNP: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) and CenterPoint Energy, Inc. (CNP) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.