ATO vs LNT
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
ATO exhibits a mixed financial profile with a Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 indicating stable but not strong financial health, and no available Altman Z-Score limits distress risk assessment. The stock trades above its Graham Number of $118.68 at $165.34, reflecting a premium valuation, though below the growth-based intrinsic value of $220.07. Strong profitability metrics like a 25.49% profit margin and 30.70% operating margin contrast with weak liquidity (Current Ratio: 0.77) and bearish technical trend. Analysts consensus is 'hold' with a target price of $177.55, implying modest upside, while insider activity shows slight selling pressure.
LNT exhibits stable operational health with a Piotroski F-Score of 6/9, but faces a severe valuation disconnect. The current price of $73.10 trades at a massive premium to both the Graham Number ($44.89) and the growth-based Intrinsic Value ($21.98). While revenue growth remains healthy at 9%, the negative earnings growth (-5.8%) and a bearish technical trend (10/100) suggest the stock is currently overextended. The company remains a stable regulated utility, but the lack of earnings growth makes the current P/E multiple difficult to justify.
Compare Another Pair
Related Comparisons
ATO vs LNT: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) and Alliant Energy Corporation (LNT) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.