AUNA vs AZN
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
AUNA exhibits a Piotroski F-Score of 6/9, indicating stable financial health, but lacks an Altman Z-Score, limiting distress risk assessment. The stock appears undervalued with a current price of $5.66 versus a Graham Number of $12.0, suggesting defensive fair value, though growth metrics are weak with negative earnings and revenue growth. Profitability margins and ROE are positive, but high debt/equity and declining earnings raise concerns. Analysts recommend a 'buy' with a target price of $8.77, implying upside potential, but recent price volatility and deteriorating fundamentals temper bullishness.
AstraZeneca's deterministic health score is concerning with a Piotroski F-Score of 4/9, indicating marginal financial stability. While profitability metrics like ROE (21.67%) and gross margin (83.26%) are strong, the current price of $92.95 trades significantly above the Graham Number of $45.06, reflecting high growth expectations. Revenue and earnings growth are robust (12% and 78% YoY, respectively), but recent earnings surprises have been volatile, including a -25.9% miss in Q3 2025. Analysts maintain a strong_buy recommendation, though insider selling and weak technical trends (10/100) suggest caution near-term.
Compare Another Pair
Related Comparisons
AUNA vs AZN: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares Auna SA (AUNA) and AstraZeneca PLC (AZN) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.