AZN vs GMAB
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
AstraZeneca's deterministic health score is concerning with a Piotroski F-Score of 4/9, indicating marginal financial stability. While profitability metrics like ROE (21.67%) and gross margin (83.26%) are strong, the current price of $92.95 trades significantly above the Graham Number of $45.06, reflecting high growth expectations. Revenue and earnings growth are robust (12% and 78% YoY, respectively), but recent earnings surprises have been volatile, including a -25.9% miss in Q3 2025. Analysts maintain a strong_buy recommendation, though insider selling and weak technical trends (10/100) suggest caution near-term.
GMAB presents a conflicted profile with a stable Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 and a current price ($28.28) trading at a significant premium to its Graham Number ($18.13) and Intrinsic Value ($10.78). While the company maintains elite gross margins (93.6%) and a low P/E relative to the healthcare sector average, it is plagued by a severe YoY earnings collapse of -94.4%. The strong Q/Q revenue growth of 42.25% suggests a potential turnaround, but the bearish technical trend and poor long-term price performance (5Y Change -15.8%) warrant caution.
Compare Another Pair
Related Comparisons
AZN vs GMAB: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares AstraZeneca PLC (AZN) and Genmab A/S (GMAB) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.