AZN vs MGNX
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
AstraZeneca's deterministic health score is concerning with a Piotroski F-Score of 4/9, indicating marginal financial stability. While profitability metrics like ROE (21.67%) and gross margin (83.26%) are strong, the current price of $92.95 trades significantly above the Graham Number of $45.06, reflecting high growth expectations. Revenue and earnings growth are robust (12% and 78% YoY, respectively), but recent earnings surprises have been volatile, including a -25.9% miss in Q3 2025. Analysts maintain a strong_buy recommendation, though insider selling and weak technical trends (10/100) suggest caution near-term.
MGNX exhibits critical fundamental weakness, highlighted by a Piotroski F-Score of 0/9, indicating severe deterioration across all financial health dimensions. While the company shows explosive revenue growth (113% YoY) and maintains a strong liquidity position (Current Ratio 5.10), it suffers from negative gross margins and a consistent track record of missing earnings estimates. The recent 1-year price surge appears decoupled from fundamental value, as the company remains deeply unprofitable with a catastrophic ROE of -86.94%.
Compare Another Pair
Related Comparisons
AZN vs MGNX: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares AstraZeneca PLC (AZN) and MacroGenics, Inc. (MGNX) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.