No connection

Search Results

BABA vs BGI

BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
NEUTRAL
Price
$173.23
Market Cap
$413.56B
Sector
Consumer Cyclical
AI Confidence
65%
BGI
Birks Group Inc.
BEARISH
Price
$0.72
Market Cap
$14.1M
Sector
Consumer Cyclical
AI Confidence
95%

Valuation

P/E Ratio
BABA
23.6
BGI
--
Forward P/E
BABA
19.5
BGI
--
P/B Ratio
BABA
2.71
BGI
-0.94
P/S Ratio
BABA
0.41
BGI
0.07
EV/EBITDA
BABA
20.1
BGI
26.06

Profitability

Gross Margin
BABA
41.17%
BGI
37.48%
Operating Margin
BABA
2.17%
BGI
-0.19%
Profit Margin
BABA
12.19%
BGI
-6.44%
ROE
BABA
11.19%
BGI
--
ROA
BABA
4.03%
BGI
-0.26%

Growth

Revenue Growth
BABA
4.8%
BGI
16.2%
Earnings Growth
BABA
-51.8%
BGI
--

Financial Health

Debt/Equity
BABA
0.27
BGI
--
Current Ratio
BABA
1.46
BGI
0.88
Quick Ratio
BABA
0.84
BGI
0.05

Dividends

Dividend Yield
BABA
0.59%
BGI
--
Payout Ratio
BABA
14.4%
BGI
0.0%

AI Verdict

BABA NEUTRAL

The Advanced Deterministic Scorecard reveals a mixed financial profile for Alibaba (BABA), with a weak Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 indicating suboptimal financial health, and no available Altman Z-Score limiting distress risk assessment. While valuation metrics appear favorable relative to peers—especially a Price/Sales of 0.41 and Forward P/E of 19.50—earnings growth is sharply negative (YoY EPS down 71%), and recent quarterly beats have reversed into consistent misses over the last four quarters. Strong insider sentiment and a bullish analyst consensus (strong_buy) contrast with deteriorating profitability and weak technical trends (10/100). The stock trades significantly above the Graham Number ($102.68) and intrinsic value estimate ($51.38), suggesting overvaluation unless growth rebounds materially.

Strengths
Attractive valuation multiples relative to sector: P/E (23.60) and Price/Sales (0.41) well below sector averages (Avg P/E: 49.05, Avg P/S: N/A but implied high)
Low debt burden with Debt/Equity of 0.27, well below sector average of 1.63, providing financial flexibility
Strong gross margin of 41.17%, reflecting pricing power and operational efficiency in core e-commerce
Risks
Weak Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 signals deteriorating financial health—penalizes health score per instructions
Earnings in freefall: YoY EPS growth down 71.0%, Q/Q down 70.4%, with last four quarters missing estimates by an average of -10.5%
Operating margin collapsed to 2.17%, indicating severe pressure in profitability despite stable gross margins
BGI BEARISH

BGI exhibits severe financial distress, anchored by a weak Piotroski F-Score of 3/9 and a negative Price-to-Book ratio (-0.94) indicating negative shareholder equity. While the company shows modest revenue growth of 16.20%, this is overshadowed by a critical liquidity crisis evidenced by a Quick Ratio of 0.05. The technical trend is entirely bearish with a 91.2% decline over three years, suggesting a lack of investor confidence and potential insolvency risks. Overall, the company is operating in a distressed state with no clear path to fundamental recovery.

Strengths
Positive year-over-year revenue growth of 16.20%
Healthy gross margin of 37.48%
Extremely low Price-to-Sales ratio (0.07)
Risks
Negative equity as indicated by the -0.94 Price/Book ratio
Severe liquidity risk with a Quick Ratio of 0.05
Weak financial health score (Piotroski 3/9)

Compare Another Pair

BABA vs BGI: Head-to-Head Comparison

This page compares Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) and Birks Group Inc. (BGI) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.

Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.

Home
Terminal
AI Chat
Markets
Profile