No connection

Search Results

BABA vs BIRK

BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
NEUTRAL
Price
$173.23
Market Cap
$413.56B
Sector
Consumer Cyclical
AI Confidence
65%
BIRK
Birkenstock Holding plc
NEUTRAL
Price
$39.55
Market Cap
$7.27B
Sector
Consumer Cyclical
AI Confidence
72%

Valuation

P/E Ratio
BABA
23.6
BIRK
18.14
Forward P/E
BABA
19.5
BIRK
13.83
P/B Ratio
BABA
2.71
BIRK
2.27
P/S Ratio
BABA
0.41
BIRK
3.47
EV/EBITDA
BABA
20.1
BIRK
13.38

Profitability

Gross Margin
BABA
41.17%
BIRK
59.18%
Operating Margin
BABA
2.17%
BIRK
22.04%
Profit Margin
BABA
12.19%
BIRK
16.61%
ROE
BABA
11.19%
BIRK
13.03%
ROA
BABA
4.03%
BIRK
7.04%

Growth

Revenue Growth
BABA
4.8%
BIRK
15.5%
Earnings Growth
BABA
-51.8%
BIRK
82.7%

Financial Health

Debt/Equity
BABA
0.27
BIRK
0.49
Current Ratio
BABA
1.46
BIRK
2.81
Quick Ratio
BABA
0.84
BIRK
1.14

Dividends

Dividend Yield
BABA
0.59%
BIRK
--
Payout Ratio
BABA
14.4%
BIRK
0.0%

AI Verdict

BABA NEUTRAL

The Advanced Deterministic Scorecard reveals a mixed financial profile for Alibaba (BABA), with a weak Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 indicating suboptimal financial health, and no available Altman Z-Score limiting distress risk assessment. While valuation metrics appear favorable relative to peers—especially a Price/Sales of 0.41 and Forward P/E of 19.50—earnings growth is sharply negative (YoY EPS down 71%), and recent quarterly beats have reversed into consistent misses over the last four quarters. Strong insider sentiment and a bullish analyst consensus (strong_buy) contrast with deteriorating profitability and weak technical trends (10/100). The stock trades significantly above the Graham Number ($102.68) and intrinsic value estimate ($51.38), suggesting overvaluation unless growth rebounds materially.

Strengths
Attractive valuation multiples relative to sector: P/E (23.60) and Price/Sales (0.41) well below sector averages (Avg P/E: 49.05, Avg P/S: N/A but implied high)
Low debt burden with Debt/Equity of 0.27, well below sector average of 1.63, providing financial flexibility
Strong gross margin of 41.17%, reflecting pricing power and operational efficiency in core e-commerce
Risks
Weak Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 signals deteriorating financial health—penalizes health score per instructions
Earnings in freefall: YoY EPS growth down 71.0%, Q/Q down 70.4%, with last four quarters missing estimates by an average of -10.5%
Operating margin collapsed to 2.17%, indicating severe pressure in profitability despite stable gross margins
BIRK NEUTRAL

BIRK's deterministic scorecard shows a Piotroski F-Score of 4/9, indicating stable but not strong financial health, while the absence of an Altman Z-Score prevents a full distress risk assessment. The stock trades below the analyst target price of $59.87 and significantly above the conservative Graham Number of $29.22, suggesting valuation is driven by growth expectations. Despite strong profitability metrics like a 22.04% operating margin and 15.50% YoY revenue growth, recent quarterly earnings show deceleration with a -26.1% Q/Q EPS decline. Insider sentiment is neutral at 40/100, and technical indicators are bearish, offsetting otherwise solid fundamentals.

Strengths
Strong profitability with gross margin of 59.18% and operating margin of 22.04%, well above sector average
Healthy balance sheet highlighted by a current ratio of 2.81 and low debt/equity of 0.49
Robust year-over-year earnings growth of 82.70% and revenue growth of 15.50%, outpacing peer averages
Risks
Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 suggests only moderate financial health, limiting confidence in sustained operational strength
Missing Altman Z-Score prevents assessment of bankruptcy risk; absence could indicate data gaps or structural concerns
Significant negative Q/Q EPS growth of -26.1%, indicating recent earnings deterioration despite strong YoY figures

Compare Another Pair

BABA vs BIRK: Head-to-Head Comparison

This page compares Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) and Birkenstock Holding plc (BIRK) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.

Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.

Home
Terminal
AI
Markets
Profile