No connection

Search Results

BABA vs CYD

BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
NEUTRAL
Price
$173.23
Market Cap
$413.56B
Sector
Consumer Cyclical
AI Confidence
65%
CYD
China Yuchai International Limited
BULLISH
Price
$42.24
Market Cap
$1.58B
Sector
Consumer Cyclical
AI Confidence
75%

Valuation

P/E Ratio
BABA
23.6
CYD
20.11
Forward P/E
BABA
19.5
CYD
12.77
P/B Ratio
BABA
2.71
CYD
1.19
P/S Ratio
BABA
0.41
CYD
0.06
EV/EBITDA
BABA
20.1
CYD
--

Profitability

Gross Margin
BABA
41.17%
CYD
16.49%
Operating Margin
BABA
2.17%
CYD
4.32%
Profit Margin
BABA
12.19%
CYD
2.18%
ROE
BABA
11.19%
CYD
--
ROA
BABA
4.03%
CYD
--

Growth

Revenue Growth
BABA
4.8%
CYD
23.0%
Earnings Growth
BABA
-51.8%
CYD
109.1%

Financial Health

Debt/Equity
BABA
0.27
CYD
--
Current Ratio
BABA
1.46
CYD
--
Quick Ratio
BABA
0.84
CYD
--

Dividends

Dividend Yield
BABA
0.59%
CYD
1.25%
Payout Ratio
BABA
14.4%
CYD
26.55%

AI Verdict

BABA NEUTRAL

The Advanced Deterministic Scorecard reveals a mixed financial profile for Alibaba (BABA), with a weak Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 indicating suboptimal financial health, and no available Altman Z-Score limiting distress risk assessment. While valuation metrics appear favorable relative to peers—especially a Price/Sales of 0.41 and Forward P/E of 19.50—earnings growth is sharply negative (YoY EPS down 71%), and recent quarterly beats have reversed into consistent misses over the last four quarters. Strong insider sentiment and a bullish analyst consensus (strong_buy) contrast with deteriorating profitability and weak technical trends (10/100). The stock trades significantly above the Graham Number ($102.68) and intrinsic value estimate ($51.38), suggesting overvaluation unless growth rebounds materially.

Strengths
Attractive valuation multiples relative to sector: P/E (23.60) and Price/Sales (0.41) well below sector averages (Avg P/E: 49.05, Avg P/S: N/A but implied high)
Low debt burden with Debt/Equity of 0.27, well below sector average of 1.63, providing financial flexibility
Strong gross margin of 41.17%, reflecting pricing power and operational efficiency in core e-commerce
Risks
Weak Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 signals deteriorating financial health—penalizes health score per instructions
Earnings in freefall: YoY EPS growth down 71.0%, Q/Q down 70.4%, with last four quarters missing estimates by an average of -10.5%
Operating margin collapsed to 2.17%, indicating severe pressure in profitability despite stable gross margins
CYD BULLISH

CYD presents a compelling value opportunity with a stable Piotroski F-Score of 5/9 and a current price ($42.24) trading very close to its Graham Number ($40.87) and well below its intrinsic value ($61.95). The company exhibits explosive earnings growth (109.1% YoY) and an exceptionally low PEG ratio of 0.33, suggesting significant undervaluation relative to its growth trajectory. While technical trends are currently bearish and profit margins are thin, the fundamental valuation metrics and analyst price targets ($55.54) point toward strong upside potential.

Strengths
Exceptional PEG ratio (0.33) indicating deep undervaluation relative to growth
Extremely low Price-to-Sales ratio (0.06)
Strong YoY earnings growth of 109.1%
Risks
Dangerously thin profit margins (2.18%)
Bearish technical trend (0/100 score)
High volatility in quarterly earnings surprises

Compare Another Pair

BABA vs CYD: Head-to-Head Comparison

This page compares Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) and China Yuchai International Limited (CYD) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.

Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.

Home
Terminal
AI Chat
Markets
Profile