No connection

Search Results

BABA vs DECK

BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
NEUTRAL
Price
$173.23
Market Cap
$413.56B
Sector
Consumer Cyclical
AI Confidence
65%
DECK
Deckers Outdoor Corporation
BULLISH
Price
$108.53
Market Cap
$15.41B
Sector
Consumer Cyclical
AI Confidence
85%

Valuation

P/E Ratio
BABA
23.6
DECK
15.42
Forward P/E
BABA
19.5
DECK
14.79
P/B Ratio
BABA
2.71
DECK
5.92
P/S Ratio
BABA
0.41
DECK
2.87
EV/EBITDA
BABA
20.1
DECK
10.05

Profitability

Gross Margin
BABA
41.17%
DECK
57.55%
Operating Margin
BABA
2.17%
DECK
31.38%
Profit Margin
BABA
12.19%
DECK
19.35%
ROE
BABA
11.19%
DECK
39.69%
ROA
BABA
4.03%
DECK
19.9%

Growth

Revenue Growth
BABA
4.8%
DECK
7.1%
Earnings Growth
BABA
-51.8%
DECK
11.0%

Financial Health

Debt/Equity
BABA
0.27
DECK
0.13
Current Ratio
BABA
1.46
DECK
2.86
Quick Ratio
BABA
0.84
DECK
2.12

Dividends

Dividend Yield
BABA
0.59%
DECK
--
Payout Ratio
BABA
14.4%
DECK
0.0%

AI Verdict

BABA NEUTRAL

The Advanced Deterministic Scorecard reveals a mixed financial profile for Alibaba (BABA), with a weak Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 indicating suboptimal financial health, and no available Altman Z-Score limiting distress risk assessment. While valuation metrics appear favorable relative to peers—especially a Price/Sales of 0.41 and Forward P/E of 19.50—earnings growth is sharply negative (YoY EPS down 71%), and recent quarterly beats have reversed into consistent misses over the last four quarters. Strong insider sentiment and a bullish analyst consensus (strong_buy) contrast with deteriorating profitability and weak technical trends (10/100). The stock trades significantly above the Graham Number ($102.68) and intrinsic value estimate ($51.38), suggesting overvaluation unless growth rebounds materially.

Strengths
Attractive valuation multiples relative to sector: P/E (23.60) and Price/Sales (0.41) well below sector averages (Avg P/E: 49.05, Avg P/S: N/A but implied high)
Low debt burden with Debt/Equity of 0.27, well below sector average of 1.63, providing financial flexibility
Strong gross margin of 41.17%, reflecting pricing power and operational efficiency in core e-commerce
Risks
Weak Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 signals deteriorating financial health—penalizes health score per instructions
Earnings in freefall: YoY EPS growth down 71.0%, Q/Q down 70.4%, with last four quarters missing estimates by an average of -10.5%
Operating margin collapsed to 2.17%, indicating severe pressure in profitability despite stable gross margins
DECK BULLISH

DECK exhibits strong fundamental health with a Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 and an exceptionally clean balance sheet (Debt/Equity 0.13). While the stock trades at a premium to its Graham Number ($53.89), it is significantly undervalued relative to its growth-based intrinsic value ($165.44) and the broader Consumer Cyclical sector average P/E. The company demonstrates elite operational efficiency with a 39.69% ROE and a consistent track record of earnings surprises over 25 quarters. Despite bearish short-term technicals and insider selling, the underlying financial engine is high-performing and undervalued.

Strengths
Elite profitability metrics including 39.69% ROE and 57.55% Gross Margin
Strong financial health evidenced by a Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 and low leverage (0.13 Debt/Equity)
Exceptional earnings track record with consistent beats and high average surprises (24.01%)
Risks
Bearish insider sentiment with recent selling activity and 0 buy transactions
Negative short-term technical trend (0/100 score)
Moderate revenue growth (7.10%) which may signal a transition from hyper-growth to mature growth

Compare Another Pair

BABA vs DECK: Head-to-Head Comparison

This page compares Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) and Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.

Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.

Home
Terminal
AI Chat
Markets
Profile