No connection

Search Results

BABA vs FLWS

BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
NEUTRAL
Price
$173.23
Market Cap
$413.56B
Sector
Consumer Cyclical
AI Confidence
65%
FLWS
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.
BEARISH
Price
$3.42
Market Cap
$219.1M
Sector
Consumer Cyclical
AI Confidence
85%

Valuation

P/E Ratio
BABA
23.6
FLWS
--
Forward P/E
BABA
19.5
FLWS
-5.65
P/B Ratio
BABA
2.71
FLWS
0.76
P/S Ratio
BABA
0.41
FLWS
0.14
EV/EBITDA
BABA
20.1
FLWS
-13.11

Profitability

Gross Margin
BABA
41.17%
FLWS
37.63%
Operating Margin
BABA
2.17%
FLWS
10.85%
Profit Margin
BABA
12.19%
FLWS
-13.41%
ROE
BABA
11.19%
FLWS
-54.17%
ROA
BABA
4.03%
FLWS
-4.59%

Growth

Revenue Growth
BABA
4.8%
FLWS
-9.5%
Earnings Growth
BABA
-51.8%
FLWS
10.0%

Financial Health

Debt/Equity
BABA
0.27
FLWS
0.89
Current Ratio
BABA
1.46
FLWS
1.25
Quick Ratio
BABA
0.84
FLWS
0.75

Dividends

Dividend Yield
BABA
0.59%
FLWS
--
Payout Ratio
BABA
14.4%
FLWS
0.0%

AI Verdict

BABA NEUTRAL

The Advanced Deterministic Scorecard reveals a mixed financial profile for Alibaba (BABA), with a weak Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 indicating suboptimal financial health, and no available Altman Z-Score limiting distress risk assessment. While valuation metrics appear favorable relative to peers—especially a Price/Sales of 0.41 and Forward P/E of 19.50—earnings growth is sharply negative (YoY EPS down 71%), and recent quarterly beats have reversed into consistent misses over the last four quarters. Strong insider sentiment and a bullish analyst consensus (strong_buy) contrast with deteriorating profitability and weak technical trends (10/100). The stock trades significantly above the Graham Number ($102.68) and intrinsic value estimate ($51.38), suggesting overvaluation unless growth rebounds materially.

Strengths
Attractive valuation multiples relative to sector: P/E (23.60) and Price/Sales (0.41) well below sector averages (Avg P/E: 49.05, Avg P/S: N/A but implied high)
Low debt burden with Debt/Equity of 0.27, well below sector average of 1.63, providing financial flexibility
Strong gross margin of 41.17%, reflecting pricing power and operational efficiency in core e-commerce
Risks
Weak Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 signals deteriorating financial health—penalizes health score per instructions
Earnings in freefall: YoY EPS growth down 71.0%, Q/Q down 70.4%, with last four quarters missing estimates by an average of -10.5%
Operating margin collapsed to 2.17%, indicating severe pressure in profitability despite stable gross margins
FLWS BEARISH

FLWS presents as a classic value trap, characterized by a stable but mediocre Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 and a complete lack of positive momentum. While the stock trades at a deep discount to book value (P/B 0.76) and sales (P/S 0.14), these metrics are offset by shrinking revenues (-9.50% YoY) and a catastrophic 5-year price decline of 86.9%. The combination of negative net profit margins and aggressive insider selling suggests a lack of confidence in a turnaround strategy.

Strengths
Trading below book value (P/B 0.76)
Extremely low Price-to-Sales ratio (0.14)
Positive operating margin (10.85%) indicating core business viability
Risks
Consistent revenue contraction (-9.50% YoY)
Severe negative Return on Equity (-54.17%)
Heavy insider selling totaling $18.32M

Compare Another Pair

BABA vs FLWS: Head-to-Head Comparison

This page compares Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) and 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (FLWS) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.

Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.

Home
Terminal
AI
Markets
Profile