No connection

Search Results

BABA vs GPC

BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
NEUTRAL
Price
$173.23
Market Cap
$413.56B
Sector
Consumer Cyclical
AI Confidence
65%
GPC
Genuine Parts Company
BEARISH
Price
$106.56
Market Cap
$14.82B
Sector
Consumer Cyclical
AI Confidence
85%

Valuation

P/E Ratio
BABA
23.6
GPC
242.18
Forward P/E
BABA
19.5
GPC
12.73
P/B Ratio
BABA
2.71
GPC
3.28
P/S Ratio
BABA
0.41
GPC
0.6
EV/EBITDA
BABA
20.1
GPC
10.27

Profitability

Gross Margin
BABA
41.17%
GPC
37.52%
Operating Margin
BABA
2.17%
GPC
5.77%
Profit Margin
BABA
12.19%
GPC
0.24%
ROE
BABA
11.19%
GPC
1.34%
ROA
BABA
4.03%
GPC
4.54%

Growth

Revenue Growth
BABA
4.8%
GPC
6.8%
Earnings Growth
BABA
-51.8%
GPC
-2.1%

Financial Health

Debt/Equity
BABA
0.27
GPC
1.49
Current Ratio
BABA
1.46
GPC
1.09
Quick Ratio
BABA
0.84
GPC
0.39

Dividends

Dividend Yield
BABA
0.59%
GPC
3.99%
Payout Ratio
BABA
14.4%
GPC
943.75%

AI Verdict

BABA NEUTRAL

The Advanced Deterministic Scorecard reveals a mixed financial profile for Alibaba (BABA), with a weak Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 indicating suboptimal financial health, and no available Altman Z-Score limiting distress risk assessment. While valuation metrics appear favorable relative to peers—especially a Price/Sales of 0.41 and Forward P/E of 19.50—earnings growth is sharply negative (YoY EPS down 71%), and recent quarterly beats have reversed into consistent misses over the last four quarters. Strong insider sentiment and a bullish analyst consensus (strong_buy) contrast with deteriorating profitability and weak technical trends (10/100). The stock trades significantly above the Graham Number ($102.68) and intrinsic value estimate ($51.38), suggesting overvaluation unless growth rebounds materially.

Strengths
Attractive valuation multiples relative to sector: P/E (23.60) and Price/Sales (0.41) well below sector averages (Avg P/E: 49.05, Avg P/S: N/A but implied high)
Low debt burden with Debt/Equity of 0.27, well below sector average of 1.63, providing financial flexibility
Strong gross margin of 41.17%, reflecting pricing power and operational efficiency in core e-commerce
Risks
Weak Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 signals deteriorating financial health—penalizes health score per instructions
Earnings in freefall: YoY EPS growth down 71.0%, Q/Q down 70.4%, with last four quarters missing estimates by an average of -10.5%
Operating margin collapsed to 2.17%, indicating severe pressure in profitability despite stable gross margins
GPC BEARISH

GPC exhibits a stable Piotroski F-Score of 6/9, but this is overshadowed by severe valuation discrepancies and unsustainable dividend metrics. The stock trades at a massive premium to its Graham Number ($17.94) and Intrinsic Value ($3.08), while the current P/E of 242.18 indicates a collapse in recent earnings. Most critically, a payout ratio of 943.75% suggests the dividend is currently unfunded by earnings, posing a significant risk of a dividend cut.

Strengths
Stable Piotroski F-Score (6/9) indicating baseline financial health
Positive revenue growth (6.80% YoY)
Attractive Forward P/E (12.73) suggesting expected earnings recovery
Risks
Unsustainable dividend payout ratio (943.75%)
Severe overvaluation relative to Graham Number and Intrinsic Value
Poor liquidity indicated by a Quick Ratio of 0.39

Compare Another Pair

BABA vs GPC: Head-to-Head Comparison

This page compares Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) and Genuine Parts Company (GPC) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.

Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.

Home
Terminal
AI Chat
Markets
Profile