No connection

Search Results

BABA vs GTX

BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
NEUTRAL
Price
$173.23
Market Cap
$413.56B
Sector
Consumer Cyclical
AI Confidence
65%
GTX
Garrett Motion Inc.
NEUTRAL
Price
$19.48
Market Cap
$3.79B
Sector
Consumer Cyclical
AI Confidence
85%

Valuation

P/E Ratio
BABA
23.6
GTX
12.82
Forward P/E
BABA
19.5
GTX
9.28
P/B Ratio
BABA
2.71
GTX
-4.63
P/S Ratio
BABA
0.41
GTX
1.06
EV/EBITDA
BABA
20.1
GTX
8.25

Profitability

Gross Margin
BABA
41.17%
GTX
20.4%
Operating Margin
BABA
2.17%
GTX
14.14%
Profit Margin
BABA
12.19%
GTX
8.65%
ROE
BABA
11.19%
GTX
--
ROA
BABA
4.03%
GTX
13.62%

Growth

Revenue Growth
BABA
4.8%
GTX
5.6%
Earnings Growth
BABA
-51.8%
GTX
-9.8%

Financial Health

Debt/Equity
BABA
0.27
GTX
--
Current Ratio
BABA
1.46
GTX
0.97
Quick Ratio
BABA
0.84
GTX
0.58

Dividends

Dividend Yield
BABA
0.59%
GTX
1.65%
Payout Ratio
BABA
14.4%
GTX
17.11%

AI Verdict

BABA NEUTRAL

The Advanced Deterministic Scorecard reveals a mixed financial profile for Alibaba (BABA), with a weak Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 indicating suboptimal financial health, and no available Altman Z-Score limiting distress risk assessment. While valuation metrics appear favorable relative to peers—especially a Price/Sales of 0.41 and Forward P/E of 19.50—earnings growth is sharply negative (YoY EPS down 71%), and recent quarterly beats have reversed into consistent misses over the last four quarters. Strong insider sentiment and a bullish analyst consensus (strong_buy) contrast with deteriorating profitability and weak technical trends (10/100). The stock trades significantly above the Graham Number ($102.68) and intrinsic value estimate ($51.38), suggesting overvaluation unless growth rebounds materially.

Strengths
Attractive valuation multiples relative to sector: P/E (23.60) and Price/Sales (0.41) well below sector averages (Avg P/E: 49.05, Avg P/S: N/A but implied high)
Low debt burden with Debt/Equity of 0.27, well below sector average of 1.63, providing financial flexibility
Strong gross margin of 41.17%, reflecting pricing power and operational efficiency in core e-commerce
Risks
Weak Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 signals deteriorating financial health—penalizes health score per instructions
Earnings in freefall: YoY EPS growth down 71.0%, Q/Q down 70.4%, with last four quarters missing estimates by an average of -10.5%
Operating margin collapsed to 2.17%, indicating severe pressure in profitability despite stable gross margins
GTX NEUTRAL

GTX presents a stark contrast between strong price momentum and fragile fundamentals. While the Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 indicates a stable but mediocre financial health, the negative Price-to-Book ratio (-4.63) reveals negative shareholders' equity, a significant red flag. The stock is currently trading at a substantial premium to its growth-based intrinsic value of $10.64, despite a low forward P/E of 9.28. Recent price gains are decoupled from declining year-over-year earnings growth (-9.80%) and bearish insider activity.

Strengths
Low Forward P/E (9.28) relative to sector average (39.86)
Strong 1-year price performance (+128.5%)
Consistent recent earnings beats (3 of last 4 quarters)
Risks
Negative shareholders' equity (indicated by P/B of -4.63)
Significant overvaluation relative to intrinsic value ($19.48 vs $10.64)
Declining YoY earnings growth (-9.80%)

Compare Another Pair

BABA vs GTX: Head-to-Head Comparison

This page compares Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) and Garrett Motion Inc. (GTX) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.

Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.

Home
Terminal
AI
Markets
Profile