BABA vs HEPS
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
The Advanced Deterministic Scorecard reveals a mixed financial profile for Alibaba (BABA), with a weak Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 indicating suboptimal financial health, and no available Altman Z-Score limiting distress risk assessment. While valuation metrics appear favorable relative to peers—especially a Price/Sales of 0.41 and Forward P/E of 19.50—earnings growth is sharply negative (YoY EPS down 71%), and recent quarterly beats have reversed into consistent misses over the last four quarters. Strong insider sentiment and a bullish analyst consensus (strong_buy) contrast with deteriorating profitability and weak technical trends (10/100). The stock trades significantly above the Graham Number ($102.68) and intrinsic value estimate ($51.38), suggesting overvaluation unless growth rebounds materially.
The company exhibits severe financial distress, highlighted by a critical Piotroski F-Score of 1/9, indicating fundamental weakness across almost all health metrics. While revenue growth remains strong at 36.9% YoY, this has failed to translate into profitability, as evidenced by a catastrophic ROE of -213.73% and a consistent track record of missing earnings estimates. Liquidity is a primary concern with a Quick Ratio of 0.59 and a Current Ratio below 1.0, suggesting an inability to meet short-term obligations. Despite a positive analyst target price, the deterministic data points to a high-risk profile with significant insolvency concerns.
Compare Another Pair
Related Comparisons
BABA vs HEPS: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) and D-Market Elektronik Hizmetler ve Ticaret A.S. (HEPS) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.