No connection

Search Results

BABA vs JACK

BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
NEUTRAL
Price
$173.23
Market Cap
$413.56B
Sector
Consumer Cyclical
AI Confidence
65%
JACK
Jack in the Box Inc.
BEARISH
Price
$11.45
Market Cap
$218.7M
Sector
Consumer Cyclical
AI Confidence
95%

Valuation

P/E Ratio
BABA
23.6
JACK
--
Forward P/E
BABA
19.5
JACK
2.97
P/B Ratio
BABA
2.71
JACK
-0.23
P/S Ratio
BABA
0.41
JACK
0.15
EV/EBITDA
BABA
20.1
JACK
11.47

Profitability

Gross Margin
BABA
41.17%
JACK
27.53%
Operating Margin
BABA
2.17%
JACK
14.41%
Profit Margin
BABA
12.19%
JACK
-8.09%
ROE
BABA
11.19%
JACK
--
ROA
BABA
4.03%
JACK
4.58%

Growth

Revenue Growth
BABA
4.8%
JACK
-5.8%
Earnings Growth
BABA
-51.8%
JACK
--

Financial Health

Debt/Equity
BABA
0.27
JACK
--
Current Ratio
BABA
1.46
JACK
0.66
Quick Ratio
BABA
0.84
JACK
0.46

Dividends

Dividend Yield
BABA
0.59%
JACK
15.71%
Payout Ratio
BABA
14.4%
JACK
30.99%

AI Verdict

BABA NEUTRAL

The Advanced Deterministic Scorecard reveals a mixed financial profile for Alibaba (BABA), with a weak Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 indicating suboptimal financial health, and no available Altman Z-Score limiting distress risk assessment. While valuation metrics appear favorable relative to peers—especially a Price/Sales of 0.41 and Forward P/E of 19.50—earnings growth is sharply negative (YoY EPS down 71%), and recent quarterly beats have reversed into consistent misses over the last four quarters. Strong insider sentiment and a bullish analyst consensus (strong_buy) contrast with deteriorating profitability and weak technical trends (10/100). The stock trades significantly above the Graham Number ($102.68) and intrinsic value estimate ($51.38), suggesting overvaluation unless growth rebounds materially.

Strengths
Attractive valuation multiples relative to sector: P/E (23.60) and Price/Sales (0.41) well below sector averages (Avg P/E: 49.05, Avg P/S: N/A but implied high)
Low debt burden with Debt/Equity of 0.27, well below sector average of 1.63, providing financial flexibility
Strong gross margin of 41.17%, reflecting pricing power and operational efficiency in core e-commerce
Risks
Weak Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 signals deteriorating financial health—penalizes health score per instructions
Earnings in freefall: YoY EPS growth down 71.0%, Q/Q down 70.4%, with last four quarters missing estimates by an average of -10.5%
Operating margin collapsed to 2.17%, indicating severe pressure in profitability despite stable gross margins
JACK BEARISH

JACK exhibits severe financial distress, highlighted by a weak Piotroski F-Score of 2/9 and a negative Price-to-Book ratio (-0.23), indicating negative shareholder equity. While the forward P/E of 2.97 and a 15.71% dividend yield appear attractive, they are classic 'value trap' indicators given the -5.80% revenue growth and a 5-year price collapse of 88.8%. The combination of negative net profit margins, poor liquidity (Current Ratio 0.66), and consistent earnings misses (0/4 beats) suggests a deteriorating business model.

Strengths
Positive operating margin (14.41%)
Extremely low Price/Sales ratio (0.15)
High current dividend yield (15.71%)
Risks
Negative book value indicating insolvency risk
Severe liquidity constraints (Quick Ratio 0.46)
Consistent earnings misses (Average surprise -19.45% over last 4 quarters)

Compare Another Pair

BABA vs JACK: Head-to-Head Comparison

This page compares Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) and Jack in the Box Inc. (JACK) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.

Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.

Home
Terminal
AI
Markets
Profile