No connection

Search Results

BABA vs JOUT

BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
NEUTRAL
Price
$173.23
Market Cap
$413.56B
Sector
Consumer Cyclical
AI Confidence
65%
JOUT
Johnson Outdoors Inc.
NEUTRAL
Price
$51.62
Market Cap
$539.6M
Sector
Consumer Cyclical
AI Confidence
80%

Valuation

P/E Ratio
BABA
23.6
JOUT
--
Forward P/E
BABA
19.5
JOUT
21.33
P/B Ratio
BABA
2.71
JOUT
1.28
P/S Ratio
BABA
0.41
JOUT
0.86
EV/EBITDA
BABA
20.1
JOUT
20.24

Profitability

Gross Margin
BABA
41.17%
JOUT
36.36%
Operating Margin
BABA
2.17%
JOUT
-2.07%
Profit Margin
BABA
12.19%
JOUT
-3.56%
ROE
BABA
11.19%
JOUT
-5.22%
ROA
BABA
4.03%
JOUT
0.12%

Growth

Revenue Growth
BABA
4.8%
JOUT
30.9%
Earnings Growth
BABA
-51.8%
JOUT
--

Financial Health

Debt/Equity
BABA
0.27
JOUT
0.11
Current Ratio
BABA
1.46
JOUT
3.78
Quick Ratio
BABA
0.84
JOUT
2.0

Dividends

Dividend Yield
BABA
0.59%
JOUT
2.56%
Payout Ratio
BABA
14.4%
JOUT
272.34%

AI Verdict

BABA NEUTRAL

The Advanced Deterministic Scorecard reveals a mixed financial profile for Alibaba (BABA), with a weak Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 indicating suboptimal financial health, and no available Altman Z-Score limiting distress risk assessment. While valuation metrics appear favorable relative to peers—especially a Price/Sales of 0.41 and Forward P/E of 19.50—earnings growth is sharply negative (YoY EPS down 71%), and recent quarterly beats have reversed into consistent misses over the last four quarters. Strong insider sentiment and a bullish analyst consensus (strong_buy) contrast with deteriorating profitability and weak technical trends (10/100). The stock trades significantly above the Graham Number ($102.68) and intrinsic value estimate ($51.38), suggesting overvaluation unless growth rebounds materially.

Strengths
Attractive valuation multiples relative to sector: P/E (23.60) and Price/Sales (0.41) well below sector averages (Avg P/E: 49.05, Avg P/S: N/A but implied high)
Low debt burden with Debt/Equity of 0.27, well below sector average of 1.63, providing financial flexibility
Strong gross margin of 41.17%, reflecting pricing power and operational efficiency in core e-commerce
Risks
Weak Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 signals deteriorating financial health—penalizes health score per instructions
Earnings in freefall: YoY EPS growth down 71.0%, Q/Q down 70.4%, with last four quarters missing estimates by an average of -10.5%
Operating margin collapsed to 2.17%, indicating severe pressure in profitability despite stable gross margins
JOUT NEUTRAL

JOUT exhibits a stable financial foundation with a Piotroski F-Score of 5/9 and an exceptionally clean balance sheet (Debt/Equity 0.11). While the company has achieved impressive revenue growth of 30.9% and a strong 1-year price rally, it remains fundamentally unprofitable with negative net and operating margins. The dividend is currently unsustainable, featuring a payout ratio of 272.34%, and insider activity is bearish. The valuation is stretched relative to earnings, as evidenced by a PEG ratio of 3.21.

Strengths
Very low leverage with a Debt/Equity ratio of 0.11
Strong liquidity position with a Current Ratio of 3.78
Robust top-line growth (30.9% YoY Revenue Growth)
Risks
Negative profitability (Profit Margin -3.56%, ROE -5.22%)
Unsustainable dividend payout ratio of 272.34%
Bearish insider sentiment with consistent selling and zero buys

Compare Another Pair

BABA vs JOUT: Head-to-Head Comparison

This page compares Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) and Johnson Outdoors Inc. (JOUT) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.

Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.

Home
Terminal
AI
Markets
Profile