No connection

Search Results

BABA vs LQDT

BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
NEUTRAL
Price
$173.23
Market Cap
$413.56B
Sector
Consumer Cyclical
AI Confidence
65%
LQDT
Liquidity Services, Inc.
NEUTRAL
Price
$32.60
Market Cap
$1.01B
Sector
Consumer Cyclical
AI Confidence
85%

Valuation

P/E Ratio
BABA
23.6
LQDT
35.43
Forward P/E
BABA
19.5
LQDT
21.31
P/B Ratio
BABA
2.71
LQDT
4.67
P/S Ratio
BABA
0.41
LQDT
2.13
EV/EBITDA
BABA
20.1
LQDT
19.28

Profitability

Gross Margin
BABA
41.17%
LQDT
45.35%
Operating Margin
BABA
2.17%
LQDT
7.73%
Profit Margin
BABA
12.19%
LQDT
6.26%
ROE
BABA
11.19%
LQDT
14.72%
ROA
BABA
4.03%
LQDT
6.78%

Growth

Revenue Growth
BABA
4.8%
LQDT
-0.9%
Earnings Growth
BABA
-51.8%
LQDT
27.8%

Financial Health

Debt/Equity
BABA
0.27
LQDT
0.06
Current Ratio
BABA
1.46
LQDT
1.53
Quick Ratio
BABA
0.84
LQDT
1.36

Dividends

Dividend Yield
BABA
0.59%
LQDT
--
Payout Ratio
BABA
14.4%
LQDT
0.0%

AI Verdict

BABA NEUTRAL

The Advanced Deterministic Scorecard reveals a mixed financial profile for Alibaba (BABA), with a weak Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 indicating suboptimal financial health, and no available Altman Z-Score limiting distress risk assessment. While valuation metrics appear favorable relative to peers—especially a Price/Sales of 0.41 and Forward P/E of 19.50—earnings growth is sharply negative (YoY EPS down 71%), and recent quarterly beats have reversed into consistent misses over the last four quarters. Strong insider sentiment and a bullish analyst consensus (strong_buy) contrast with deteriorating profitability and weak technical trends (10/100). The stock trades significantly above the Graham Number ($102.68) and intrinsic value estimate ($51.38), suggesting overvaluation unless growth rebounds materially.

Strengths
Attractive valuation multiples relative to sector: P/E (23.60) and Price/Sales (0.41) well below sector averages (Avg P/E: 49.05, Avg P/S: N/A but implied high)
Low debt burden with Debt/Equity of 0.27, well below sector average of 1.63, providing financial flexibility
Strong gross margin of 41.17%, reflecting pricing power and operational efficiency in core e-commerce
Risks
Weak Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 signals deteriorating financial health—penalizes health score per instructions
Earnings in freefall: YoY EPS growth down 71.0%, Q/Q down 70.4%, with last four quarters missing estimates by an average of -10.5%
Operating margin collapsed to 2.17%, indicating severe pressure in profitability despite stable gross margins
LQDT NEUTRAL

LQDT demonstrates exceptional operational health with a Piotroski F-Score of 8/9 and a very low Debt/Equity ratio of 0.06. However, the stock is currently trading at a premium ($32.60) relative to both its Graham Number ($12.03) and its Intrinsic Value ($27.14). While the company has an impressive track record of earnings beats and strong YoY earnings growth (27.8%), this is contrasted by stagnant revenue growth (-0.90%) and aggressive insider selling by the CEO and CFO. The disconnect between strong fundamental health and bearish insider/technical signals suggests the stock is currently overextended.

Strengths
Strong financial health indicated by a Piotroski F-Score of 8/9
Negligible debt levels with a Debt/Equity ratio of 0.06
Exceptional earnings track record with consistent beats over 25 quarters
Risks
Stagnant top-line growth with YoY revenue growth at -0.90%
Heavy insider selling by C-suite executives (CEO and CFO)
Current market price exceeds growth-based intrinsic value ($27.14)

Compare Another Pair

BABA vs LQDT: Head-to-Head Comparison

This page compares Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) and Liquidity Services, Inc. (LQDT) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.

Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.

Home
Terminal
AI
Markets
Profile