No connection

Search Results

BABA vs LVS

BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
NEUTRAL
Price
$173.23
Market Cap
$413.56B
Sector
Consumer Cyclical
AI Confidence
65%
LVS
Las Vegas Sands Corp.
NEUTRAL
Price
$53.72
Market Cap
$35.6B
Sector
Consumer Cyclical
AI Confidence
85%

Valuation

P/E Ratio
BABA
23.6
LVS
19.82
Forward P/E
BABA
19.5
LVS
14.58
P/B Ratio
BABA
2.71
LVS
29.73
P/S Ratio
BABA
0.41
LVS
2.59
EV/EBITDA
BABA
20.1
LVS
10.03

Profitability

Gross Margin
BABA
41.17%
LVS
80.09%
Operating Margin
BABA
2.17%
LVS
25.44%
Profit Margin
BABA
12.19%
LVS
13.41%
ROE
BABA
11.19%
LVS
90.45%
ROA
BABA
4.03%
LVS
9.9%

Growth

Revenue Growth
BABA
4.8%
LVS
25.3%
Earnings Growth
BABA
-51.8%
LVS
73.0%

Financial Health

Debt/Equity
BABA
0.27
LVS
9.81
Current Ratio
BABA
1.46
LVS
0.92
Quick Ratio
BABA
0.84
LVS
0.86

Dividends

Dividend Yield
BABA
0.59%
LVS
2.05%
Payout Ratio
BABA
14.4%
LVS
38.75%

AI Verdict

BABA NEUTRAL

The Advanced Deterministic Scorecard reveals a mixed financial profile for Alibaba (BABA), with a weak Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 indicating suboptimal financial health, and no available Altman Z-Score limiting distress risk assessment. While valuation metrics appear favorable relative to peers—especially a Price/Sales of 0.41 and Forward P/E of 19.50—earnings growth is sharply negative (YoY EPS down 71%), and recent quarterly beats have reversed into consistent misses over the last four quarters. Strong insider sentiment and a bullish analyst consensus (strong_buy) contrast with deteriorating profitability and weak technical trends (10/100). The stock trades significantly above the Graham Number ($102.68) and intrinsic value estimate ($51.38), suggesting overvaluation unless growth rebounds materially.

Strengths
Attractive valuation multiples relative to sector: P/E (23.60) and Price/Sales (0.41) well below sector averages (Avg P/E: 49.05, Avg P/S: N/A but implied high)
Low debt burden with Debt/Equity of 0.27, well below sector average of 1.63, providing financial flexibility
Strong gross margin of 41.17%, reflecting pricing power and operational efficiency in core e-commerce
Risks
Weak Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 signals deteriorating financial health—penalizes health score per instructions
Earnings in freefall: YoY EPS growth down 71.0%, Q/Q down 70.4%, with last four quarters missing estimates by an average of -10.5%
Operating margin collapsed to 2.17%, indicating severe pressure in profitability despite stable gross margins
LVS NEUTRAL

LVS presents a dichotomy between strong operational recovery and precarious financial leverage, evidenced by a stable Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 and a significant gap between its Graham Number ($10.5) and Intrinsic Value ($79.94). While the company exhibits explosive earnings growth (73% YoY) and a favorable PEG ratio (0.97), these are offset by an alarming Debt/Equity ratio of 9.81 and a bearish technical trend. The strong analyst 'buy' consensus is countered by aggressive insider selling, specifically from the CEO, suggesting a disconnect between market expectations and internal sentiment.

Strengths
Explosive earnings growth (73% YoY) and revenue growth (25.3% YoY)
High operational efficiency with an 80.09% gross margin and 25.44% operating margin
Strong recovery in EPS, with 3 of the last 4 quarters beating estimates significantly
Risks
Extreme financial leverage with a Debt/Equity ratio of 9.81
Liquidity concerns indicated by a Current Ratio (0.92) and Quick Ratio (0.86) below 1.0
Heavy insider selling, with the CEO liquidating over $168M in shares

Compare Another Pair

BABA vs LVS: Head-to-Head Comparison

This page compares Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) and Las Vegas Sands Corp. (LVS) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.

Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.

Home
Terminal
AI Chat
Markets
Profile