No connection

Search Results

BABA vs MLCO

BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
NEUTRAL
Price
$173.23
Market Cap
$413.56B
Sector
Consumer Cyclical
AI Confidence
65%
MLCO
Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited
NEUTRAL
Price
$5.66
Market Cap
$2.3B
Sector
Consumer Cyclical
AI Confidence
70%

Valuation

P/E Ratio
BABA
23.6
MLCO
12.3
Forward P/E
BABA
19.5
MLCO
7.05
P/B Ratio
BABA
2.71
MLCO
-1.77
P/S Ratio
BABA
0.41
MLCO
0.45
EV/EBITDA
BABA
20.1
MLCO
10.77

Profitability

Gross Margin
BABA
41.17%
MLCO
37.94%
Operating Margin
BABA
2.17%
MLCO
16.12%
Profit Margin
BABA
12.19%
MLCO
3.58%
ROE
BABA
11.19%
MLCO
--
ROA
BABA
4.03%
MLCO
5.31%

Growth

Revenue Growth
BABA
4.8%
MLCO
8.6%
Earnings Growth
BABA
-51.8%
MLCO
--

Financial Health

Debt/Equity
BABA
0.27
MLCO
--
Current Ratio
BABA
1.46
MLCO
1.07
Quick Ratio
BABA
0.84
MLCO
0.97

Dividends

Dividend Yield
BABA
0.59%
MLCO
--
Payout Ratio
BABA
14.4%
MLCO
0.0%

AI Verdict

BABA NEUTRAL

The Advanced Deterministic Scorecard reveals a mixed financial profile for Alibaba (BABA), with a weak Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 indicating suboptimal financial health, and no available Altman Z-Score limiting distress risk assessment. While valuation metrics appear favorable relative to peers—especially a Price/Sales of 0.41 and Forward P/E of 19.50—earnings growth is sharply negative (YoY EPS down 71%), and recent quarterly beats have reversed into consistent misses over the last four quarters. Strong insider sentiment and a bullish analyst consensus (strong_buy) contrast with deteriorating profitability and weak technical trends (10/100). The stock trades significantly above the Graham Number ($102.68) and intrinsic value estimate ($51.38), suggesting overvaluation unless growth rebounds materially.

Strengths
Attractive valuation multiples relative to sector: P/E (23.60) and Price/Sales (0.41) well below sector averages (Avg P/E: 49.05, Avg P/S: N/A but implied high)
Low debt burden with Debt/Equity of 0.27, well below sector average of 1.63, providing financial flexibility
Strong gross margin of 41.17%, reflecting pricing power and operational efficiency in core e-commerce
Risks
Weak Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 signals deteriorating financial health—penalizes health score per instructions
Earnings in freefall: YoY EPS growth down 71.0%, Q/Q down 70.4%, with last four quarters missing estimates by an average of -10.5%
Operating margin collapsed to 2.17%, indicating severe pressure in profitability despite stable gross margins
MLCO NEUTRAL

MLCO presents a complex profile with a stable Piotroski F-Score of 6/9, indicating a recovering financial foundation. While valuation metrics are highly attractive—highlighted by a PEG ratio of 0.42 and a Forward P/E of 7.05—the company suffers from a critical balance sheet issue evidenced by a negative Price/Book ratio (-1.77), implying negative shareholders' equity. The company has successfully transitioned from deep pandemic-era losses to positive earnings, but the current price of $5.66 trades at a premium to its growth-based intrinsic value of $3.22. Overall, it is a high-risk value play dependent on continued operational recovery in the resorts sector.

Strengths
Extremely low PEG ratio (0.42) suggesting significant undervaluation relative to growth
Strong Forward P/E (7.05) compared to the Consumer Cyclical average (35.90)
Successful pivot from multi-year losses to consistent positive earnings surprises
Risks
Negative Price/Book ratio indicating negative shareholders' equity
Very thin net profit margin (3.58%) leaving little room for operational error
Tight liquidity with a current ratio of 1.07 and quick ratio of 0.97

Compare Another Pair

BABA vs MLCO: Head-to-Head Comparison

This page compares Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) and Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited (MLCO) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.

Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.

Home
Terminal
AI
Markets
Profile