No connection

Search Results

BABA vs NCI

BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
NEUTRAL
Price
$173.23
Market Cap
$413.56B
Sector
Consumer Cyclical
AI Confidence
65%
NCI
Neo-Concept International Group Holdings Limited
BEARISH
Price
$0.51
Market Cap
$9.6M
Sector
Consumer Cyclical
AI Confidence
75%

Valuation

P/E Ratio
BABA
23.6
NCI
1.82
Forward P/E
BABA
19.5
NCI
--
P/B Ratio
BABA
2.71
NCI
0.28
P/S Ratio
BABA
0.41
NCI
0.04
EV/EBITDA
BABA
20.1
NCI
3.99

Profitability

Gross Margin
BABA
41.17%
NCI
27.18%
Operating Margin
BABA
2.17%
NCI
3.75%
Profit Margin
BABA
12.19%
NCI
4.01%
ROE
BABA
11.19%
NCI
16.09%
ROA
BABA
4.03%
NCI
6.19%

Growth

Revenue Growth
BABA
4.8%
NCI
-24.0%
Earnings Growth
BABA
-51.8%
NCI
34.0%

Financial Health

Debt/Equity
BABA
0.27
NCI
1.18
Current Ratio
BABA
1.46
NCI
1.85
Quick Ratio
BABA
0.84
NCI
0.49

Dividends

Dividend Yield
BABA
0.59%
NCI
--
Payout Ratio
BABA
14.4%
NCI
0.0%

AI Verdict

BABA NEUTRAL

The Advanced Deterministic Scorecard reveals a mixed financial profile for Alibaba (BABA), with a weak Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 indicating suboptimal financial health, and no available Altman Z-Score limiting distress risk assessment. While valuation metrics appear favorable relative to peers—especially a Price/Sales of 0.41 and Forward P/E of 19.50—earnings growth is sharply negative (YoY EPS down 71%), and recent quarterly beats have reversed into consistent misses over the last four quarters. Strong insider sentiment and a bullish analyst consensus (strong_buy) contrast with deteriorating profitability and weak technical trends (10/100). The stock trades significantly above the Graham Number ($102.68) and intrinsic value estimate ($51.38), suggesting overvaluation unless growth rebounds materially.

Strengths
Attractive valuation multiples relative to sector: P/E (23.60) and Price/Sales (0.41) well below sector averages (Avg P/E: 49.05, Avg P/S: N/A but implied high)
Low debt burden with Debt/Equity of 0.27, well below sector average of 1.63, providing financial flexibility
Strong gross margin of 41.17%, reflecting pricing power and operational efficiency in core e-commerce
Risks
Weak Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 signals deteriorating financial health—penalizes health score per instructions
Earnings in freefall: YoY EPS growth down 71.0%, Q/Q down 70.4%, with last four quarters missing estimates by an average of -10.5%
Operating margin collapsed to 2.17%, indicating severe pressure in profitability despite stable gross margins
NCI BEARISH

Despite a strong Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 and extreme valuation discounts (Graham Number $3.39 vs Price $0.51), NCI exhibits the classic characteristics of a value trap. The company is experiencing a catastrophic price collapse, with a 91.8% decline in the last month and a 98.9% loss over five years. While earnings are growing and ROE is positive, the 24% YoY revenue contraction and total lack of technical momentum suggest a fundamental breakdown in market confidence that outweighs the deterministic value metrics.

Strengths
Strong Piotroski F-Score (7/9) indicating solid short-term financial health
Extremely low valuation multiples (P/E 1.82, P/B 0.28)
Positive ROE (16.08%) significantly outperforming sector average (-9.85%)
Risks
Severe revenue contraction (-24% YoY) indicating declining demand
Catastrophic price action (-91.8% in 1 month) suggesting a potential liquidity or solvency crisis not yet reflected in lagging metrics
Low Quick Ratio (0.49) indicating high reliance on inventory liquidation for liquidity

Compare Another Pair

BABA vs NCI: Head-to-Head Comparison

This page compares Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) and Neo-Concept International Group Holdings Limited (NCI) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.

Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.

Home
Terminal
AI
Markets
Profile