No connection

Search Results

BABA vs NCL

BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
NEUTRAL
Price
$173.23
Market Cap
$413.56B
Sector
Consumer Cyclical
AI Confidence
65%
NCL
Northann Corp.
BEARISH
Price
$0.16
Market Cap
$8.6M
Sector
Consumer Cyclical
AI Confidence
95%

Valuation

P/E Ratio
BABA
23.6
NCL
--
Forward P/E
BABA
19.5
NCL
--
P/B Ratio
BABA
2.71
NCL
0.41
P/S Ratio
BABA
0.41
NCL
0.63
EV/EBITDA
BABA
20.1
NCL
-1.23

Profitability

Gross Margin
BABA
41.17%
NCL
26.3%
Operating Margin
BABA
2.17%
NCL
42.11%
Profit Margin
BABA
12.19%
NCL
-85.83%
ROE
BABA
11.19%
NCL
-201.11%
ROA
BABA
4.03%
NCL
-41.73%

Growth

Revenue Growth
BABA
4.8%
NCL
14.0%
Earnings Growth
BABA
-51.8%
NCL
--

Financial Health

Debt/Equity
BABA
0.27
NCL
0.64
Current Ratio
BABA
1.46
NCL
1.67
Quick Ratio
BABA
0.84
NCL
0.76

Dividends

Dividend Yield
BABA
0.59%
NCL
--
Payout Ratio
BABA
14.4%
NCL
0.0%

AI Verdict

BABA NEUTRAL

The Advanced Deterministic Scorecard reveals a mixed financial profile for Alibaba (BABA), with a weak Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 indicating suboptimal financial health, and no available Altman Z-Score limiting distress risk assessment. While valuation metrics appear favorable relative to peers—especially a Price/Sales of 0.41 and Forward P/E of 19.50—earnings growth is sharply negative (YoY EPS down 71%), and recent quarterly beats have reversed into consistent misses over the last four quarters. Strong insider sentiment and a bullish analyst consensus (strong_buy) contrast with deteriorating profitability and weak technical trends (10/100). The stock trades significantly above the Graham Number ($102.68) and intrinsic value estimate ($51.38), suggesting overvaluation unless growth rebounds materially.

Strengths
Attractive valuation multiples relative to sector: P/E (23.60) and Price/Sales (0.41) well below sector averages (Avg P/E: 49.05, Avg P/S: N/A but implied high)
Low debt burden with Debt/Equity of 0.27, well below sector average of 1.63, providing financial flexibility
Strong gross margin of 41.17%, reflecting pricing power and operational efficiency in core e-commerce
Risks
Weak Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 signals deteriorating financial health—penalizes health score per instructions
Earnings in freefall: YoY EPS growth down 71.0%, Q/Q down 70.4%, with last four quarters missing estimates by an average of -10.5%
Operating margin collapsed to 2.17%, indicating severe pressure in profitability despite stable gross margins
NCL BEARISH

NCL exhibits severe financial distress, highlighted by a critical Piotroski F-Score of 1/9 and a catastrophic 1-year price decline of 99.3%. While the company shows modest revenue growth of 14%, this is completely overshadowed by a net profit margin of -85.83% and an ROE of -201.11%. The massive discrepancy between the 52-week high ($97.28) and current price ($0.16) suggests a total collapse in investor confidence or a significant corporate event. Overall, the company is in a precarious position with negligible fundamental support.

Strengths
Positive YoY revenue growth of 14.00%
Current ratio of 1.67 suggests adequate short-term liquidity
Trading significantly below book value (P/B 0.41)
Risks
Extreme net losses with a profit margin of -85.83%
Catastrophic Return on Equity (ROE) of -201.11%
Severe price depreciation (-99.3% over 1 year)

Compare Another Pair

BABA vs NCL: Head-to-Head Comparison

This page compares Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) and Northann Corp. (NCL) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.

Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.

Home
Terminal
AI Chat
Markets
Profile