No connection

Search Results

BABA vs OSW

BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
NEUTRAL
Price
$173.23
Market Cap
$413.56B
Sector
Consumer Cyclical
AI Confidence
65%
OSW
OneSpaWorld Holdings Limited
NEUTRAL
Price
$24.42
Market Cap
$2.49B
Sector
Consumer Cyclical
AI Confidence
85%

Valuation

P/E Ratio
BABA
23.6
OSW
35.39
Forward P/E
BABA
19.5
OSW
19.03
P/B Ratio
BABA
2.71
OSW
4.56
P/S Ratio
BABA
0.41
OSW
2.59
EV/EBITDA
BABA
20.1
OSW
22.09

Profitability

Gross Margin
BABA
41.17%
OSW
13.0%
Operating Margin
BABA
2.17%
OSW
9.25%
Profit Margin
BABA
12.19%
OSW
7.45%
ROE
BABA
11.19%
OSW
13.06%
ROA
BABA
4.03%
OSW
7.77%

Growth

Revenue Growth
BABA
4.8%
OSW
11.5%
Earnings Growth
BABA
-51.8%
OSW
-9.1%

Financial Health

Debt/Equity
BABA
0.27
OSW
0.17
Current Ratio
BABA
1.46
OSW
1.91
Quick Ratio
BABA
0.84
OSW
0.89

Dividends

Dividend Yield
BABA
0.59%
OSW
0.82%
Payout Ratio
BABA
14.4%
OSW
24.64%

AI Verdict

BABA NEUTRAL

The Advanced Deterministic Scorecard reveals a mixed financial profile for Alibaba (BABA), with a weak Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 indicating suboptimal financial health, and no available Altman Z-Score limiting distress risk assessment. While valuation metrics appear favorable relative to peers—especially a Price/Sales of 0.41 and Forward P/E of 19.50—earnings growth is sharply negative (YoY EPS down 71%), and recent quarterly beats have reversed into consistent misses over the last four quarters. Strong insider sentiment and a bullish analyst consensus (strong_buy) contrast with deteriorating profitability and weak technical trends (10/100). The stock trades significantly above the Graham Number ($102.68) and intrinsic value estimate ($51.38), suggesting overvaluation unless growth rebounds materially.

Strengths
Attractive valuation multiples relative to sector: P/E (23.60) and Price/Sales (0.41) well below sector averages (Avg P/E: 49.05, Avg P/S: N/A but implied high)
Low debt burden with Debt/Equity of 0.27, well below sector average of 1.63, providing financial flexibility
Strong gross margin of 41.17%, reflecting pricing power and operational efficiency in core e-commerce
Risks
Weak Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 signals deteriorating financial health—penalizes health score per instructions
Earnings in freefall: YoY EPS growth down 71.0%, Q/Q down 70.4%, with last four quarters missing estimates by an average of -10.5%
Operating margin collapsed to 2.17%, indicating severe pressure in profitability despite stable gross margins
OSW NEUTRAL

OSW exhibits strong fundamental health with a Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 and a very conservative debt-to-equity ratio of 0.17. However, the stock is trading at a massive premium, with a current price of $24.42 far exceeding both the Graham Number ($9.11) and the Intrinsic Value ($4.83). While revenue growth remains positive at 11.5%, a concerning divergence is appearing as earnings growth has turned negative (-9.1% YoY), and insider sentiment is bearish with significant selling by the CEO and Directors.

Strengths
Strong financial health (Piotroski F-Score 7/9)
Very low leverage (Debt/Equity 0.17)
Consistent revenue growth (11.5% YoY)
Risks
Severe overvaluation relative to Graham and Intrinsic value baselines
Negative earnings growth (-16.2% Q/Q) despite rising revenues
Bearish insider activity with $1.02M in recent sales by executives

Compare Another Pair

BABA vs OSW: Head-to-Head Comparison

This page compares Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) and OneSpaWorld Holdings Limited (OSW) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.

Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.

Home
Terminal
AI
Markets
Profile