No connection

Search Results

BABA vs TRS

BABA
Alibaba Group Holding Limited
NEUTRAL
Price
$173.23
Market Cap
$413.56B
Sector
Consumer Cyclical
AI Confidence
65%
TRS
TriMas Corporation
NEUTRAL
Price
$38.27
Market Cap
$1.44B
Sector
Consumer Cyclical
AI Confidence
80%

Valuation

P/E Ratio
BABA
23.6
TRS
21.5
Forward P/E
BABA
19.5
TRS
18.4
P/B Ratio
BABA
2.71
TRS
2.04
P/S Ratio
BABA
0.41
TRS
2.23
EV/EBITDA
BABA
20.1
TRS
34.01

Profitability

Gross Margin
BABA
41.17%
TRS
21.4%
Operating Margin
BABA
2.17%
TRS
-3.38%
Profit Margin
BABA
12.19%
TRS
18.61%
ROE
BABA
11.19%
TRS
10.53%
ROA
BABA
4.03%
TRS
0.83%

Growth

Revenue Growth
BABA
4.8%
TRS
-31.8%
Earnings Growth
BABA
-51.8%
TRS
1360.7%

Financial Health

Debt/Equity
BABA
0.27
TRS
0.74
Current Ratio
BABA
1.46
TRS
2.52
Quick Ratio
BABA
0.84
TRS
0.77

Dividends

Dividend Yield
BABA
0.59%
TRS
0.42%
Payout Ratio
BABA
14.4%
TRS
8.99%

AI Verdict

BABA NEUTRAL

The Advanced Deterministic Scorecard reveals a mixed financial profile for Alibaba (BABA), with a weak Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 indicating suboptimal financial health, and no available Altman Z-Score limiting distress risk assessment. While valuation metrics appear favorable relative to peers—especially a Price/Sales of 0.41 and Forward P/E of 19.50—earnings growth is sharply negative (YoY EPS down 71%), and recent quarterly beats have reversed into consistent misses over the last four quarters. Strong insider sentiment and a bullish analyst consensus (strong_buy) contrast with deteriorating profitability and weak technical trends (10/100). The stock trades significantly above the Graham Number ($102.68) and intrinsic value estimate ($51.38), suggesting overvaluation unless growth rebounds materially.

Strengths
Attractive valuation multiples relative to sector: P/E (23.60) and Price/Sales (0.41) well below sector averages (Avg P/E: 49.05, Avg P/S: N/A but implied high)
Low debt burden with Debt/Equity of 0.27, well below sector average of 1.63, providing financial flexibility
Strong gross margin of 41.17%, reflecting pricing power and operational efficiency in core e-commerce
Risks
Weak Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 signals deteriorating financial health—penalizes health score per instructions
Earnings in freefall: YoY EPS growth down 71.0%, Q/Q down 70.4%, with last four quarters missing estimates by an average of -10.5%
Operating margin collapsed to 2.17%, indicating severe pressure in profitability despite stable gross margins
TRS NEUTRAL

TriMas Corporation presents a contradictory profile with a stable Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 and a strong 1-year price return of 90%, yet it suffers from severe fundamental deterioration. While the company maintains a healthy Debt/Equity ratio (0.74) and strong liquidity (Current Ratio 2.52), the massive YoY revenue decline of -31.80% and a negative operating margin (-3.38%) are critical concerns. The discrepancy between the Graham Number ($27.40) and the Intrinsic Value ($52.51) suggests the market is pricing in a recovery that is not yet supported by top-line growth. Overall, the stock is a speculative hold until revenue stabilizes.

Strengths
Strong liquidity position with a Current Ratio of 2.52
Manageable leverage with Debt/Equity at 0.74, below sector average
Positive net profit margin (18.61%) significantly outperforming sector peers
Risks
Severe revenue contraction (-31.80% YoY and -161.38% Q/Q)
Negative operating margin (-3.38%) indicating core business inefficiency
Low Piotroski F-Score (4/9) suggesting mediocre financial health

Compare Another Pair

BABA vs TRS: Head-to-Head Comparison

This page compares Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) and TriMas Corporation (TRS) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.

Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.

Home
Terminal
AI
Markets
Profile