BALL vs DECK
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
The Advanced Deterministic Scorecard reveals significant concerns, most notably a weak Piotroski F-Score of 3/9, indicating poor financial health based on fundamental criteria. Despite strong recent earnings growth (YoY +81.1%) and a reasonable forward P/E of 14.44, the company faces liquidity constraints (Quick Ratio: 0.68) and high leverage (Debt/Equity: 1.38). Analysts recommend a 'buy' with a $62.69 target, implying upside, but insider selling and inconsistent earnings beats (0/4 recent quarters) temper optimism. The stock trades above the Graham Number ($34.5) but below intrinsic value ($77.29), suggesting mixed valuation signals.
DECK exhibits strong fundamental health with a Piotroski F-Score of 7/9 and an exceptionally clean balance sheet (Debt/Equity 0.13). While the stock trades at a premium to its Graham Number ($53.89), it is significantly undervalued relative to its growth-based intrinsic value ($165.44) and the broader Consumer Cyclical sector average P/E. The company demonstrates elite operational efficiency with a 39.69% ROE and a consistent track record of earnings surprises over 25 quarters. Despite bearish short-term technicals and insider selling, the underlying financial engine is high-performing and undervalued.
Compare Another Pair
Related Comparisons
BALL vs DECK: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares Ball Corporation (BALL) and Deckers Outdoor Corporation (DECK) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.