No connection

Search Results

BARK vs FLWS

BARK
BARK, Inc.
BEARISH
Price
$0.92
Market Cap
$157.9M
Sector
Consumer Cyclical
AI Confidence
85%
FLWS
1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc.
BEARISH
Price
$3.42
Market Cap
$219.1M
Sector
Consumer Cyclical
AI Confidence
85%

Valuation

P/E Ratio
BARK
--
FLWS
--
Forward P/E
BARK
-10.82
FLWS
-5.65
P/B Ratio
BARK
1.83
FLWS
0.76
P/S Ratio
BARK
0.35
FLWS
0.14
EV/EBITDA
BARK
-5.35
FLWS
-13.11

Profitability

Gross Margin
BARK
61.69%
FLWS
37.63%
Operating Margin
BARK
-9.96%
FLWS
10.85%
Profit Margin
BARK
-7.81%
FLWS
-13.41%
ROE
BARK
-33.59%
FLWS
-54.17%
ROA
BARK
-8.93%
FLWS
-4.59%

Growth

Revenue Growth
BARK
-15.2%
FLWS
-9.5%
Earnings Growth
BARK
--
FLWS
10.0%

Financial Health

Debt/Equity
BARK
0.95
FLWS
0.89
Current Ratio
BARK
1.52
FLWS
1.25
Quick Ratio
BARK
0.63
FLWS
0.75

Dividends

Dividend Yield
BARK
--
FLWS
--
Payout Ratio
BARK
0.0%
FLWS
0.0%

AI Verdict

BARK BEARISH

The Advanced Deterministic Scorecard reveals a Piotroski F-Score of 5/9, indicating stable but not strong financial health, while the absence of an Altman Z-Score prevents a definitive bankruptcy risk assessment. Despite a gross margin of 61.69%, the company is unprofitable with negative operating and net margins, declining revenue, and poor earnings quality. Earnings have consistently missed estimates over the last four quarters with an average surprise of -70.94%, and insider selling signals lack of confidence. Although the stock has rallied 41.8% in the past month, long-term performance is dismal with a 5-year return of -93.4%, and analyst target prices appear overly optimistic relative to fundamentals.

Strengths
High gross margin of 61.69% suggests strong pricing power or low cost of goods sold
Current ratio of 1.52 indicates sufficient short-term liquidity
Price/Sales of 0.35 is low, potentially signaling undervaluation relative to sales
Risks
Piotroski F-Score of 5 is borderline, with no clear strength in profitability or leverage metrics
Profit margin of -7.81% and ROE of -33.59% reflect deep unprofitability and poor return on equity
Revenue growth YoY is -15.20%, indicating shrinking top line
FLWS BEARISH

FLWS presents as a classic value trap, characterized by a stable but mediocre Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 and a complete lack of positive momentum. While the stock trades at a deep discount to book value (P/B 0.76) and sales (P/S 0.14), these metrics are offset by shrinking revenues (-9.50% YoY) and a catastrophic 5-year price decline of 86.9%. The combination of negative net profit margins and aggressive insider selling suggests a lack of confidence in a turnaround strategy.

Strengths
Trading below book value (P/B 0.76)
Extremely low Price-to-Sales ratio (0.14)
Positive operating margin (10.85%) indicating core business viability
Risks
Consistent revenue contraction (-9.50% YoY)
Severe negative Return on Equity (-54.17%)
Heavy insider selling totaling $18.32M

Compare Another Pair

BARK vs FLWS: Head-to-Head Comparison

This page compares BARK, Inc. (BARK) and 1-800-FLOWERS.COM, Inc. (FLWS) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.

Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.

Home
Terminal
AI
Markets
Profile