No connection

Search Results

BHFAP vs FBK

BHFAP
Brighthouse Financial, Inc.
BEARISH
Price
$16.62
Market Cap
$2.76B
Sector
Financial Services
AI Confidence
78%
FBK
FB Financial Corporation
NEUTRAL
Price
$53.58
Market Cap
$2.75B
Sector
Financial Services
AI Confidence
80%

Valuation

P/E Ratio
BHFAP
1.32
FBK
21.87
Forward P/E
BHFAP
--
FBK
10.47
P/B Ratio
BHFAP
0.15
FBK
1.4
P/S Ratio
BHFAP
0.35
FBK
4.94
EV/EBITDA
BHFAP
--
FBK
--

Profitability

Gross Margin
BHFAP
41.3%
FBK
0.0%
Operating Margin
BHFAP
34.02%
FBK
45.75%
Profit Margin
BHFAP
12.35%
FBK
25.25%
ROE
BHFAP
16.18%
FBK
7.88%
ROA
BHFAP
0.73%
FBK
0.95%

Growth

Revenue Growth
BHFAP
-10.1%
FBK
31.9%
Earnings Growth
BHFAP
219.4%
FBK
31.0%

Financial Health

Debt/Equity
BHFAP
1.47
FBK
--
Current Ratio
BHFAP
1.55
FBK
--
Quick Ratio
BHFAP
1.18
FBK
--

Dividends

Dividend Yield
BHFAP
9.89%
FBK
1.57%
Payout Ratio
BHFAP
--
FBK
31.02%

AI Verdict

BHFAP BEARISH

The Advanced Deterministic Scorecard reveals a weak financial health profile with a Piotroski F-Score of just 3/9, indicating significant fundamental deterioration. Despite deeply discounted valuation metrics—P/E of 1.32 and Price/Book of 0.15—the company faces declining revenue (YoY -10.10%) and concerning capital structure risks, including high debt/equity of 1.47. The absence of an Altman Z-Score prevents a full distress risk assessment, but weak ROA of 0.73% and negative long-term price performance suggest underlying operational fragility. While the 9.89% dividend yield and recent short-term price rebound offer temporary appeal, these are outweighed by structural challenges and lack of analyst coverage or insider support.

Strengths
Exceptionally low P/E ratio of 1.32 suggests deep value pricing relative to earnings
High operating and gross margins (34.02% and 41.30%) indicate strong pricing power or cost control
ROE of 16.18% exceeds sector average, signaling efficient equity utilization
Risks
Piotroski F-Score of 3/9 indicates poor financial health and high risk of value trap
Revenue declining YoY by -10.10%, suggesting fundamental business contraction
Debt/Equity of 1.47 is elevated for a life insurer, increasing financial leverage risk
FBK NEUTRAL

FBK presents a stark contrast between aggressive growth and deteriorating fundamental health, highlighted by a critical Piotroski F-Score of 2/9. While the company demonstrates impressive YoY revenue and earnings growth (~31%) and a consistent track record of earnings beats, the low health score and bearish insider sentiment are significant red flags. The stock currently trades at a premium to its Graham Number ($46.0) but remains below its growth-based intrinsic value ($72.28). The bullish analyst consensus is heavily countered by poor deterministic health metrics and a bearish technical trend.

Strengths
Strong YoY Revenue and Earnings growth exceeding 31%
Consistent earnings beat track record over 25 quarters
Attractive Forward P/E of 10.47 compared to current P/E of 21.87
Risks
Critical Piotroski F-Score (2/9) indicating weak financial health
Bearish insider activity with net selling in the last 6 months
Technical trend is completely bearish (0/100)

Compare Another Pair

BHFAP vs FBK: Head-to-Head Comparison

This page compares Brighthouse Financial, Inc. (BHFAP) and FB Financial Corporation (FBK) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.

Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.

Home
Terminal
AI Chat
Markets
Profile