No connection

Search Results

BHP vs BON

BHP
BHP Group Limited
NEUTRAL
Price
$67.52
Market Cap
$173.45B
Sector
Basic Materials
AI Confidence
72%
BON
Bon Natural Life Limited
BEARISH
Price
$1.70
Market Cap
$17.3M
Sector
Basic Materials
AI Confidence
85%

Valuation

P/E Ratio
BHP
19.07
BON
0.08
Forward P/E
BHP
15.45
BON
2.93
P/B Ratio
BHP
7.19
BON
0.01
P/S Ratio
BHP
3.38
BON
0.8
EV/EBITDA
BHP
15.39
BON
0.24

Profitability

Gross Margin
BHP
82.21%
BON
27.99%
Operating Margin
BHP
37.7%
BON
3.57%
Profit Margin
BHP
17.59%
BON
2.67%
ROE
BHP
21.99%
BON
1.19%
ROA
BHP
11.02%
BON
2.13%

Growth

Revenue Growth
BHP
-8.2%
BON
-21.9%
Earnings Growth
BHP
-34.0%
BON
--

Financial Health

Debt/Equity
BHP
0.49
BON
0.16
Current Ratio
BHP
1.46
BON
2.44
Quick Ratio
BHP
1.06
BON
1.38

Dividends

Dividend Yield
BHP
3.26%
BON
--
Payout Ratio
BHP
69.9%
BON
0.0%

AI Verdict

BHP NEUTRAL

BHP's Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 indicates stable financial health, but the absence of an Altman Z-Score limits distress risk assessment. The stock trades significantly above its Graham Number of $27.35 and intrinsic value of $24.78, reflecting a substantial premium. Despite strong profitability metrics like 37.7% operating margin and 21.99% ROE, earnings and revenue growth are sharply negative year-over-year. Analysts consensus is a hold with a $57.00 target, below current price, suggesting limited upside.

Strengths
High operating margin of 37.70% indicates strong cost control and pricing power
ROE of 21.99% exceeds sector average significantly, signaling efficient equity use
Debt/Equity of 0.49 is below sector average of 0.63, indicating conservative leverage
Risks
Revenue growth down 8.20% YoY and earnings down 34.00%, indicating deteriorating fundamentals
P/E of 19.07 is high relative to earnings contraction, increasing valuation risk
Price/Book of 7.19 is extremely elevated, suggesting overvaluation relative to book value
BON BEARISH

The company exhibits weak fundamental health with a Piotroski F-Score of 6/9, indicating borderline stability, and lacks an Altman Z-Score, raising concerns about financial distress risk. Despite trading at a steep discount to the Graham Number ($337.95 vs. current price of $1.70), the business shows deteriorating fundamentals, including a -21.90% YoY revenue decline and minimal profitability. Negative long-term price performance (-99.9% over 5 years) and absence of analyst coverage further signal investor abandonment. While balance sheet metrics appear healthy, the lack of growth, cash flow data, and earnings visibility undermines any value proposition.

Strengths
Low P/E ratio of 0.08 suggests extreme valuation discount relative to earnings
Strong current ratio of 2.44 indicates solid short-term liquidity
Low debt/equity ratio of 0.16 reflects conservative capital structure
Risks
Revenue growth of -21.90% YoY shows severe top-line contraction
Missing Altman Z-Score prevents distress risk assessment; potential bankruptcy concern
Extremely low ROE of 1.19% and ROA of 2.13% indicate poor capital efficiency

Compare Another Pair

BHP vs BON: Head-to-Head Comparison

This page compares BHP Group Limited (BHP) and Bon Natural Life Limited (BON) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.

Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.

Home
Terminal
AI
Markets
Profile