No connection

Search Results

BHP vs CTVA

BHP
BHP Group Limited
NEUTRAL
Price
$67.52
Market Cap
$173.45B
Sector
Basic Materials
AI Confidence
72%
CTVA
Corteva, Inc.
NEUTRAL
Price
$66.00
Market Cap
$44.73B
Sector
Basic Materials
AI Confidence
72%

Valuation

P/E Ratio
BHP
19.07
CTVA
26.72
Forward P/E
BHP
15.45
CTVA
20.56
P/B Ratio
BHP
7.19
CTVA
1.77
P/S Ratio
BHP
3.38
CTVA
2.56
EV/EBITDA
BHP
15.39
CTVA
12.4

Profitability

Gross Margin
BHP
82.21%
CTVA
46.11%
Operating Margin
BHP
37.7%
CTVA
-10.31%
Profit Margin
BHP
17.59%
CTVA
9.19%
ROE
BHP
21.99%
CTVA
6.71%
ROA
BHP
11.02%
CTVA
3.81%

Growth

Revenue Growth
BHP
-8.2%
CTVA
12.6%
Earnings Growth
BHP
-34.0%
CTVA
--

Financial Health

Debt/Equity
BHP
0.49
CTVA
0.17
Current Ratio
BHP
1.46
CTVA
1.58
Quick Ratio
BHP
1.06
CTVA
1.0

Dividends

Dividend Yield
BHP
3.26%
CTVA
1.09%
Payout Ratio
BHP
69.9%
CTVA
27.94%

AI Verdict

BHP NEUTRAL

BHP's Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 indicates stable financial health, but the absence of an Altman Z-Score limits distress risk assessment. The stock trades significantly above its Graham Number of $27.35 and intrinsic value of $24.78, reflecting a substantial premium. Despite strong profitability metrics like 37.7% operating margin and 21.99% ROE, earnings and revenue growth are sharply negative year-over-year. Analysts consensus is a hold with a $57.00 target, below current price, suggesting limited upside.

Strengths
High operating margin of 37.70% indicates strong cost control and pricing power
ROE of 21.99% exceeds sector average significantly, signaling efficient equity use
Debt/Equity of 0.49 is below sector average of 0.63, indicating conservative leverage
Risks
Revenue growth down 8.20% YoY and earnings down 34.00%, indicating deteriorating fundamentals
P/E of 19.07 is high relative to earnings contraction, increasing valuation risk
Price/Book of 7.19 is extremely elevated, suggesting overvaluation relative to book value
CTVA NEUTRAL

Corteva (CTVA) trades at a premium valuation with mixed profitability trends and strong recent earnings surprises, though near-term earnings growth remains challenged. The stock has underperformed over the past six months (-3.3%) despite solid 1-year and 5-year returns (+16.1%, +85.9%), reflecting macro pressures in agricultural inputs. While revenue growth of 12.6% outpaces the sector average of 6.16%, negative operating margins (-10.31%) and volatile quarterly EPS performance raise concerns about execution and cost structure. Analysts are constructive with a $77.71 target implying 17.7% upside, but recent insider selling adds caution, offsetting an otherwise healthy balance sheet and sustainable dividend policy.

Strengths
Revenue growth of 12.6% significantly exceeds sector average of 6.16%
Gross margin of 46.11% reflects strong pricing power and product mix in seed and crop protection
Debt/Equity of 0.17 is well below sector average of 1.28, indicating conservative capital structure
Risks
Operating margin of -10.31% indicates severe cost or restructuring pressures despite top-line growth
Negative Q/Q EPS growth of -121.4% raises concerns about near-term profitability trajectory
Forward P/E of 20.56 is high relative to subpar ROE of 6.71% and negative operating margins

Compare Another Pair

BHP vs CTVA: Head-to-Head Comparison

This page compares BHP Group Limited (BHP) and Corteva, Inc. (CTVA) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.

Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.

Home
Terminal
AI Chat
Markets
Profile