No connection

Search Results

BHP vs CX

BHP
BHP Group Limited
NEUTRAL
Price
$67.52
Market Cap
$173.45B
Sector
Basic Materials
AI Confidence
72%
CX
CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V.
NEUTRAL
Price
$12.36
Market Cap
$17.93B
Sector
Basic Materials
AI Confidence
75%

Valuation

P/E Ratio
BHP
19.07
CX
--
Forward P/E
BHP
15.45
CX
13.29
P/B Ratio
BHP
7.19
CX
1.58
P/S Ratio
BHP
3.38
CX
1.08
EV/EBITDA
BHP
15.39
CX
49.9

Profitability

Gross Margin
BHP
82.21%
CX
32.64%
Operating Margin
BHP
37.7%
CX
10.19%
Profit Margin
BHP
17.59%
CX
2.74%
ROE
BHP
21.99%
CX
3.83%
ROA
BHP
11.02%
CX
4.27%

Growth

Revenue Growth
BHP
-8.2%
CX
10.1%
Earnings Growth
BHP
-34.0%
CX
-66.4%

Financial Health

Debt/Equity
BHP
0.49
CX
0.46
Current Ratio
BHP
1.46
CX
0.86
Quick Ratio
BHP
1.06
CX
0.55

Dividends

Dividend Yield
BHP
3.26%
CX
0.73%
Payout Ratio
BHP
69.9%
CX
32.52%

AI Verdict

BHP NEUTRAL

BHP's Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 indicates stable financial health, but the absence of an Altman Z-Score limits distress risk assessment. The stock trades significantly above its Graham Number of $27.35 and intrinsic value of $24.78, reflecting a substantial premium. Despite strong profitability metrics like 37.7% operating margin and 21.99% ROE, earnings and revenue growth are sharply negative year-over-year. Analysts consensus is a hold with a $57.00 target, below current price, suggesting limited upside.

Strengths
High operating margin of 37.70% indicates strong cost control and pricing power
ROE of 21.99% exceeds sector average significantly, signaling efficient equity use
Debt/Equity of 0.49 is below sector average of 0.63, indicating conservative leverage
Risks
Revenue growth down 8.20% YoY and earnings down 34.00%, indicating deteriorating fundamentals
P/E of 19.07 is high relative to earnings contraction, increasing valuation risk
Price/Book of 7.19 is extremely elevated, suggesting overvaluation relative to book value
CX NEUTRAL

CX presents a complex profile with a Piotroski F-Score of 4/9, indicating stable but non-improving financial health. While the company shows strong top-line revenue growth (10.10% YoY) and an extremely attractive PEG ratio of 0.39, these are offset by a severe collapse in earnings growth (-66.40% YoY). Liquidity is a primary concern with a current ratio of 0.86 and a quick ratio of 0.55, suggesting potential short-term obligations pressure. Despite a bullish analyst consensus and strong 1-year price performance, the provided technical trend score of 10/100 suggests a bearish shift in momentum.

Strengths
Strong revenue growth (10.10% YoY and 11.20% Q/Q)
Highly attractive PEG ratio (0.39) suggesting undervaluation relative to growth
Manageable Debt/Equity ratio (0.46) compared to sector average (1.03)
Risks
Severe earnings contraction (-66.40% YoY)
Weak liquidity position (Current Ratio 0.86, Quick Ratio 0.55)
Very thin net profit margins (2.74%)

Compare Another Pair

BHP vs CX: Head-to-Head Comparison

This page compares BHP Group Limited (BHP) and CEMEX, S.A.B. de C.V. (CX) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.

Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.

Home
Terminal
AI Chat
Markets
Profile