BHP vs KRO
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
BHP's Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 indicates stable financial health, but the absence of an Altman Z-Score limits distress risk assessment. The stock trades significantly above its Graham Number of $27.35 and intrinsic value of $24.78, reflecting a substantial premium. Despite strong profitability metrics like 37.7% operating margin and 21.99% ROE, earnings and revenue growth are sharply negative year-over-year. Analysts consensus is a hold with a $57.00 target, below current price, suggesting limited upside.
KRO exhibits severe financial weakness, anchored by a Piotroski F-Score of 2/9, indicating poor operational health and deteriorating fundamentals. The company transitioned from a profit in 2024 to a net loss of $110.9 million in 2025, driven by the cyclical downturn in the TiO2 market and unabsorbed fixed costs. Despite a low Price-to-Sales ratio and a strong current ratio, the company is plagued by negative profit margins and a consistent track record of missing earnings estimates (0/4 beats in the last year). With the current price of $7.21 trading significantly above the analyst target of $5.50, the risk-reward profile is unfavorable.
Compare Another Pair
Related Comparisons
BHP vs KRO: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares BHP Group Limited (BHP) and Kronos Worldwide, Inc. (KRO) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.