BHP vs MT
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
BHP's Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 indicates stable financial health, but the absence of an Altman Z-Score limits distress risk assessment. The stock trades significantly above its Graham Number of $27.35 and intrinsic value of $24.78, reflecting a substantial premium. Despite strong profitability metrics like 37.7% operating margin and 21.99% ROE, earnings and revenue growth are sharply negative year-over-year. Analysts consensus is a hold with a $57.00 target, below current price, suggesting limited upside.
ArcelorMittal presents a complex profile with a stable Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 and a current price ($55.92) trading very close to its Graham Number ($57.52). While valuation metrics like the PEG ratio (0.42) and Forward P/E (8.34) are highly attractive, there is a significant disconnect between the current price and the growth-based intrinsic value ($28.77). The company shows strong recovery in EPS growth, but a negative operating margin (-5.10%) suggests fundamental inefficiencies or cyclical headwinds that offset the positive net profit margin.
Compare Another Pair
Related Comparisons
BHP vs MT: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares BHP Group Limited (BHP) and ArcelorMittal S.A. (MT) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.