No connection

Search Results

BHP vs NWGL

BHP
BHP Group Limited
NEUTRAL
Price
$67.52
Market Cap
$173.45B
Sector
Basic Materials
AI Confidence
72%
NWGL
CL Workshop Group Limited
BEARISH
Price
$0.97
Market Cap
$16.1M
Sector
Basic Materials
AI Confidence
95%

Valuation

P/E Ratio
BHP
19.07
NWGL
--
Forward P/E
BHP
15.45
NWGL
--
P/B Ratio
BHP
7.19
NWGL
1.66
P/S Ratio
BHP
3.38
NWGL
0.78
EV/EBITDA
BHP
15.39
NWGL
-44.42

Profitability

Gross Margin
BHP
82.21%
NWGL
23.6%
Operating Margin
BHP
37.7%
NWGL
-2.41%
Profit Margin
BHP
17.59%
NWGL
-40.86%
ROE
BHP
21.99%
NWGL
-68.65%
ROA
BHP
11.02%
NWGL
-7.1%

Growth

Revenue Growth
BHP
-8.2%
NWGL
-31.4%
Earnings Growth
BHP
-34.0%
NWGL
--

Financial Health

Debt/Equity
BHP
0.49
NWGL
0.96
Current Ratio
BHP
1.46
NWGL
1.59
Quick Ratio
BHP
1.06
NWGL
0.64

Dividends

Dividend Yield
BHP
3.26%
NWGL
--
Payout Ratio
BHP
69.9%
NWGL
0.0%

AI Verdict

BHP NEUTRAL

BHP's Piotroski F-Score of 6/9 indicates stable financial health, but the absence of an Altman Z-Score limits distress risk assessment. The stock trades significantly above its Graham Number of $27.35 and intrinsic value of $24.78, reflecting a substantial premium. Despite strong profitability metrics like 37.7% operating margin and 21.99% ROE, earnings and revenue growth are sharply negative year-over-year. Analysts consensus is a hold with a $57.00 target, below current price, suggesting limited upside.

Strengths
High operating margin of 37.70% indicates strong cost control and pricing power
ROE of 21.99% exceeds sector average significantly, signaling efficient equity use
Debt/Equity of 0.49 is below sector average of 0.63, indicating conservative leverage
Risks
Revenue growth down 8.20% YoY and earnings down 34.00%, indicating deteriorating fundamentals
P/E of 19.07 is high relative to earnings contraction, increasing valuation risk
Price/Book of 7.19 is extremely elevated, suggesting overvaluation relative to book value
NWGL BEARISH

NWGL exhibits a fragile financial profile with a Piotroski F-Score of 4/9, placing it in the 'stable' but lower-tier health category. The company is suffering from severe operational distress, evidenced by a -40.86% profit margin and a catastrophic -31.40% year-over-year revenue contraction. With a 52-week price collapse of approximately 85% and a technical trend score of 0/100, the stock is in a clear long-term bearish trajectory. The lack of positive earnings renders traditional valuation models like the Graham Number inapplicable, leaving the stock trading at a premium to its book value despite declining fundamentals.

Strengths
Positive gross margin of 23.60% indicating core product viability
Current ratio of 1.59 suggests short-term solvency
Low Price-to-Sales ratio (0.78) relative to historical norms
Risks
Severe revenue contraction (-31.40% YoY) indicating loss of market share or demand
Deeply negative ROE (-68.65%) showing significant destruction of shareholder equity
Poor liquidity indicated by a Quick Ratio of 0.64

Compare Another Pair

BHP vs NWGL: Head-to-Head Comparison

This page compares BHP Group Limited (BHP) and CL Workshop Group Limited (NWGL) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.

Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.

Home
Terminal
AI
Markets
Profile