No connection

Search Results

BMBL vs MCS

BMBL
Bumble Inc.
BEARISH
Price
$3.54
Market Cap
$562.7M
Sector
Communication Services
AI Confidence
88%
MCS
The Marcus Corporation
BEARISH
Price
$18.98
Market Cap
$583.4M
Sector
Communication Services
AI Confidence
85%

Valuation

P/E Ratio
BMBL
--
MCS
46.29
Forward P/E
BMBL
3.81
MCS
35.15
P/B Ratio
BMBL
0.59
MCS
1.27
P/S Ratio
BMBL
0.56
MCS
0.81
EV/EBITDA
BMBL
3.92
MCS
9.95

Profitability

Gross Margin
BMBL
70.69%
MCS
40.88%
Operating Margin
BMBL
26.88%
MCS
3.9%
Profit Margin
BMBL
-19.82%
MCS
1.77%
ROE
BMBL
-23.81%
MCS
2.75%
ROA
BMBL
6.17%
MCS
1.21%

Growth

Revenue Growth
BMBL
-10.0%
MCS
3.1%
Earnings Growth
BMBL
--
MCS
523.7%

Financial Health

Debt/Equity
BMBL
0.58
MCS
0.73
Current Ratio
BMBL
3.55
MCS
0.4
Quick Ratio
BMBL
3.25
MCS
0.26

Dividends

Dividend Yield
BMBL
--
MCS
1.69%
Payout Ratio
BMBL
0.0%
MCS
73.17%

AI Verdict

BMBL BEARISH

BMBL's Advanced Deterministic Scorecard reveals severe financial distress, highlighted by a critically low Piotroski F-Score of 2/9, indicating weak fundamental health. Despite attractive valuation multiples like a Forward P/E of 3.81 and Price/Book of 0.59, the company is plagued by negative earnings, shrinking revenues, and deteriorating profitability, with a -19.82% profit margin and -10.00% YoY revenue growth. Persistent negative earnings surprises, collapsing EPS trends (-87.9% YoY), and substantial insider selling—over $113M in the last six months—further erode confidence. While strong operating margins (26.88%) and solid liquidity (Current Ratio: 3.55) offer limited support, they are insufficient to offset the broader deterioration in earnings quality and investor sentiment.

Strengths
High gross margin (70.69%) indicates strong pricing power and low cost of revenue
Low Forward P/E of 3.81 suggests deep value pricing relative to earnings potential
Healthy liquidity position with Current Ratio of 3.55 and Quick Ratio of 3.25
Risks
Critically low Piotroski F-Score of 2/9 signals severe financial weakness and poor earnings quality
Profit margin of -19.82% and ROE of -23.81% reflect ongoing profitability crisis
Revenue declining YoY by -10.00%, indicating weakening demand or competitive pressures
MCS BEARISH

The Marcus Corporation exhibits significant fundamental fragility, highlighted by a mediocre Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 and a critical liquidity crisis with a Current Ratio of 0.40. While the stock has seen recent price momentum and strong earnings growth (recovery-based), it trades at a substantial premium to its Graham Number ($11.74) and Intrinsic Value ($12.09). The combination of thin profit margins (1.77%), bearish insider selling by the CEO, and a high PEG ratio suggests the current valuation is unsustainable. Despite analyst 'strong buy' ratings, the deterministic data points to a high-risk profile.

Strengths
Strong recent earnings surprise track record (3/4 beats)
Low Price-to-Sales ratio (0.81) suggesting efficient revenue generation relative to market cap
Manageable Debt/Equity ratio (0.73) compared to sector averages
Risks
Severe liquidity risk indicated by a Current Ratio of 0.40 and Quick Ratio of 0.26
Extreme overvaluation relative to defensive fair value (Price $18.98 vs Graham $11.74)
Very thin profitability margins (Profit Margin 1.77%, ROE 2.75%)

Compare Another Pair

BMBL vs MCS: Head-to-Head Comparison

This page compares Bumble Inc. (BMBL) and The Marcus Corporation (MCS) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.

Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.

Home
Terminal
AI Chat
Markets
Profile