No connection

Search Results

BRK-B vs CNA

BRK-B
Berkshire Hathaway Inc.
NEUTRAL
Price
$479.75
Market Cap
$1.03T
Sector
Financial Services
AI Confidence
85%
CNA
CNA Financial Corporation
NEUTRAL
Price
$48.18
Market Cap
$13.04B
Sector
Financial Services
AI Confidence
85%

Valuation

P/E Ratio
BRK-B
15.46
CNA
10.27
Forward P/E
BRK-B
22.06
CNA
10.04
P/B Ratio
BRK-B
0.0
CNA
1.12
P/S Ratio
BRK-B
2.79
CNA
0.87
EV/EBITDA
BRK-B
-2.12
CNA
7.39

Profitability

Gross Margin
BRK-B
26.15%
CNA
32.0%
Operating Margin
BRK-B
32.96%
CNA
10.81%
Profit Margin
BRK-B
18.03%
CNA
8.53%
ROE
BRK-B
9.81%
CNA
11.55%
ROA
BRK-B
5.11%
CNA
1.61%

Growth

Revenue Growth
BRK-B
-0.7%
CNA
3.8%
Earnings Growth
BRK-B
-2.5%
CNA
1333.5%

Financial Health

Debt/Equity
BRK-B
0.19
CNA
0.27
Current Ratio
BRK-B
7.07
CNA
0.37
Quick Ratio
BRK-B
6.62
CNA
0.18

Dividends

Dividend Yield
BRK-B
--
CNA
3.99%
Payout Ratio
BRK-B
0.0%
CNA
39.23%

AI Verdict

BRK-B NEUTRAL

The deterministic health profile is weak, highlighted by a Piotroski F-Score of 3/9, indicating deteriorating operational efficiency and profitability trends. While the company maintains a fortress balance sheet with a Debt/Equity ratio of 0.19 and a Current Ratio of 7.07, the stock is trading at a significant premium to its growth-based intrinsic value of $217.21. Negative YoY revenue and earnings growth, coupled with a bearish technical trend, offset the positive analyst sentiment and long-term historical performance.

Strengths
Exceptional liquidity with a Current Ratio of 7.07
Very low leverage (Debt/Equity 0.19)
Strong operating margins at 32.96%
Risks
Significant overvaluation relative to intrinsic value ($479.75 vs $217.21)
Negative YoY earnings growth (-2.50%) and revenue growth (-0.70%)
Weak Piotroski F-Score (3/9) suggesting declining financial health trends
CNA NEUTRAL

CNA presents a classic deep-value profile with a Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 (Stable) and a current price ($48.18) trading significantly below both its Graham Number ($67.31) and Intrinsic Value ($138.36). While valuation metrics like the P/E (10.27) and PEG (0.92) are highly attractive, the stock is hampered by bearish insider sentiment and a negative technical trend. The massive YoY earnings growth is likely a statistical anomaly, as recent Q/Q and YoY EPS growth are actually negative. The company's stability is bolstered by its 92% ownership by Loews Corporation, but the lack of analyst conviction and insider selling suggest a lack of immediate catalysts.

Strengths
Significant undervaluation relative to Graham Number and Intrinsic Value
Low P/E ratio (10.27) compared to the broader financial services sector
Conservative Debt/Equity ratio (0.27) indicating strong solvency
Risks
Bearish insider activity with consistent selling and zero buying
Negative recent earnings momentum (Q/Q EPS growth of -22.7%)
Potential for insurance reserve insufficiency leading to earnings charges

Compare Another Pair

BRK-B vs CNA: Head-to-Head Comparison

This page compares Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK-B) and CNA Financial Corporation (CNA) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.

Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.

Home
Terminal
AI Chat
Markets
Profile