No connection

Search Results

BTE vs NESR

BTE
Baytex Energy Corp.
BEARISH
Price
$3.32
Market Cap
$2.55B
Sector
Energy
AI Confidence
78%
NESR
National Energy Services Reunited Corp.
NEUTRAL
Price
$23.25
Market Cap
$2.34B
Sector
Energy
AI Confidence
85%

Valuation

P/E Ratio
BTE
16.6
NESR
44.71
Forward P/E
BTE
16.35
NESR
9.72
P/B Ratio
BTE
0.84
NESR
2.42
P/S Ratio
BTE
0.84
NESR
1.77
EV/EBITDA
BTE
2.39
NESR
10.64

Profitability

Gross Margin
BTE
66.91%
NESR
12.44%
Operating Margin
BTE
17.33%
NESR
7.7%
Profit Margin
BTE
7.02%
NESR
3.86%
ROE
BTE
5.25%
NESR
5.45%
ROA
BTE
4.75%
NESR
3.39%

Growth

Revenue Growth
BTE
-12.3%
NESR
15.9%
Earnings Growth
BTE
-82.6%
NESR
-72.3%

Financial Health

Debt/Equity
BTE
0.48
NESR
0.35
Current Ratio
BTE
0.58
NESR
1.04
Quick Ratio
BTE
0.52
NESR
0.79

Dividends

Dividend Yield
BTE
2.03%
NESR
--
Payout Ratio
BTE
32.14%
NESR
0.0%

AI Verdict

BTE BEARISH

The Advanced Deterministic Scorecard reveals a weak financial health profile with a Piotroski F-Score of 4/9, indicating borderline stability, and a concerning lack of Altman Z-Score data, which raises transparency and solvency concerns. Despite trading below its Graham Number of $4.22 at $3.32, the stock shows deteriorating fundamentals, including sharply negative earnings and revenue growth (YoY: -82.6% and -12.3%, respectively), weak profitability trends, and a deteriorating technical trend (10/100). While the dividend appears sustainable with a 32% payout ratio, the current ratio of 0.58 signals near-term liquidity pressure. The company's inconsistent earnings performance, with frequent large misses and volatility in surprises, undermines confidence in its operational predictability.

Strengths
Trading below Graham Number ($3.32 vs $4.22), suggesting potential undervaluation on a defensive basis
Relatively low P/E ratio (16.60) compared to sector average (23.13), indicating possible value appeal
Strong gross margin (66.91%), reflecting pricing power or cost efficiency in core operations
Risks
Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 indicates weak financial health, particularly concerning for a capital-intensive energy firm
Extremely weak technical trend (10/100) suggests strong bearish momentum and lack of investor confidence
Severe earnings contraction (YoY EPS growth: -82.6%), among the worst in the sector
NESR NEUTRAL

NESR exhibits strong operational health with a Piotroski F-Score of 7/9, though it lacks an Altman Z-Score for bankruptcy risk assessment. While the company shows impressive price momentum and a low Forward P/E of 9.72, the current price of $23.25 trades at a massive premium compared to its Graham Number ($10.60) and Intrinsic Value ($3.64). The disconnect between deterministic value and market price suggests the stock is priced for aggressive future growth rather than current fundamentals. Overall, the strong balance sheet and revenue growth are offset by extreme valuation stretching.

Strengths
Strong operational health indicated by a Piotroski F-Score of 7/9
Low leverage with a Debt/Equity ratio of 0.35
Consistent revenue growth (15.90% YoY)
Risks
Severe valuation premium over Graham and Intrinsic value baselines
Tight liquidity indicated by a Current Ratio of 1.04 and Quick Ratio of 0.79
High volatility in earnings growth (-72.30% YoY)

Compare Another Pair

BTE vs NESR: Head-to-Head Comparison

This page compares Baytex Energy Corp. (BTE) and National Energy Services Reunited Corp. (NESR) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.

Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.

Home
Terminal
AI Chat
Markets
Profile