No connection

Search Results

BTE vs PTEN

BTE
Baytex Energy Corp.
BEARISH
Price
$3.32
Market Cap
$2.55B
Sector
Energy
AI Confidence
78%
PTEN
Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc.
BEARISH
Price
$9.42
Market Cap
$3.58B
Sector
Energy
AI Confidence
85%

Valuation

P/E Ratio
BTE
16.6
PTEN
--
Forward P/E
BTE
16.35
PTEN
-44.19
P/B Ratio
BTE
0.84
PTEN
1.11
P/S Ratio
BTE
0.84
PTEN
0.74
EV/EBITDA
BTE
2.39
PTEN
4.93

Profitability

Gross Margin
BTE
66.91%
PTEN
24.24%
Operating Margin
BTE
17.33%
PTEN
-2.44%
Profit Margin
BTE
7.02%
PTEN
-1.94%
ROE
BTE
5.25%
PTEN
-2.78%
ROA
BTE
4.75%
PTEN
-0.44%

Growth

Revenue Growth
BTE
-12.3%
PTEN
-1.0%
Earnings Growth
BTE
-82.6%
PTEN
--

Financial Health

Debt/Equity
BTE
0.48
PTEN
0.4
Current Ratio
BTE
0.58
PTEN
1.64
Quick Ratio
BTE
0.52
PTEN
1.38

Dividends

Dividend Yield
BTE
2.03%
PTEN
4.25%
Payout Ratio
BTE
32.14%
PTEN
213.33%

AI Verdict

BTE BEARISH

The Advanced Deterministic Scorecard reveals a weak financial health profile with a Piotroski F-Score of 4/9, indicating borderline stability, and a concerning lack of Altman Z-Score data, which raises transparency and solvency concerns. Despite trading below its Graham Number of $4.22 at $3.32, the stock shows deteriorating fundamentals, including sharply negative earnings and revenue growth (YoY: -82.6% and -12.3%, respectively), weak profitability trends, and a deteriorating technical trend (10/100). While the dividend appears sustainable with a 32% payout ratio, the current ratio of 0.58 signals near-term liquidity pressure. The company's inconsistent earnings performance, with frequent large misses and volatility in surprises, undermines confidence in its operational predictability.

Strengths
Trading below Graham Number ($3.32 vs $4.22), suggesting potential undervaluation on a defensive basis
Relatively low P/E ratio (16.60) compared to sector average (23.13), indicating possible value appeal
Strong gross margin (66.91%), reflecting pricing power or cost efficiency in core operations
Risks
Piotroski F-Score of 4/9 indicates weak financial health, particularly concerning for a capital-intensive energy firm
Extremely weak technical trend (10/100) suggests strong bearish momentum and lack of investor confidence
Severe earnings contraction (YoY EPS growth: -82.6%), among the worst in the sector
PTEN BEARISH

PTEN exhibits severe fundamental weakness, highlighted by a critical Piotroski F-Score of 2/9, indicating a deteriorating financial position. While the stock has seen a strong 1-year price increase, this is disconnected from operational reality: the company reports negative profit margins and an unsustainable dividend payout ratio of 213.33%. Bearish insider sentiment and negative revenue growth further undermine the bullish analyst consensus. The combination of operational inefficiency and capital mismanagement suggests a high risk of a price correction.

Strengths
Low Debt/Equity ratio (0.40) relative to energy sector average
Healthy liquidity with a Current Ratio of 1.64
Low Price-to-Sales ratio (0.74) suggesting low valuation relative to revenue
Risks
Critical Piotroski F-Score (2/9) signaling poor financial health
Unsustainable dividend payout ratio (213.33%)
Negative profit and operating margins

Compare Another Pair

BTE vs PTEN: Head-to-Head Comparison

This page compares Baytex Energy Corp. (BTE) and Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. (PTEN) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.

Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.

Home
Terminal
AI
Markets
Profile