No connection

Search Results

BTU vs GLNG

BTU
Peabody Energy Corporation
BEARISH
Price
$37.96
Market Cap
$4.62B
Sector
Energy
AI Confidence
78%
GLNG
Golar LNG Limited
BEARISH
Price
$53.39
Market Cap
$5.43B
Sector
Energy
AI Confidence
85%

Valuation

P/E Ratio
BTU
--
GLNG
92.05
Forward P/E
BTU
10.81
GLNG
58.99
P/B Ratio
BTU
1.3
GLNG
2.93
P/S Ratio
BTU
1.16
GLNG
13.81
EV/EBITDA
BTU
10.48
GLNG
48.66

Profitability

Gross Margin
BTU
13.85%
GLNG
54.48%
Operating Margin
BTU
-1.84%
GLNG
35.75%
Profit Margin
BTU
-0.83%
GLNG
16.69%
ROE
BTU
-0.43%
GLNG
5.07%
ROA
BTU
0.52%
GLNG
1.29%

Growth

Revenue Growth
BTU
-7.0%
GLNG
101.5%
Earnings Growth
BTU
--
GLNG
128.9%

Financial Health

Debt/Equity
BTU
0.11
GLNG
1.34
Current Ratio
BTU
1.99
GLNG
2.54
Quick Ratio
BTU
1.14
GLNG
2.47

Dividends

Dividend Yield
BTU
0.78%
GLNG
1.82%
Payout Ratio
BTU
27.52%
GLNG
166.67%

AI Verdict

BTU BEARISH

The Advanced Deterministic Scorecard reveals severe financial health concerns with a Piotroski F-Score of just 2/9, indicating weak operational and balance sheet performance. Despite a low forward P/E of 10.81 and a strong analyst recommendation of 'strong_buy', the company is unprofitable (negative net and operating margins), has deteriorating earnings (YoY EPS growth of -95.9%), and lacks key valuation benchmarks like a Graham Number or Altman Z-Score due to financial instability. While the balance sheet shows a healthy current ratio and low debt/equity, persistent losses, poor earnings predictability, and negative insider activity undermine any bullish case. The stock's recent price surge (+99.3% in 1Y) appears disconnected from fundamentals, increasing vulnerability to correction.

Strengths
Low forward P/E ratio of 10.81 suggests potential undervaluation relative to earnings capacity
Strong liquidity position with current ratio of 1.99 and quick ratio of 1.14
Minimal leverage with debt/equity ratio of 0.11, reducing solvency risk
Risks
Critically low Piotroski F-Score of 2/9 signals severe financial distress and weak operating performance
Negative profitability across all metrics: net margin (-0.83%), operating margin (-1.84%), and ROE (-0.43%)
Earnings are highly volatile and trending down, with YoY EPS growth of -95.9% and erratic estimate beats
GLNG BEARISH

GLNG exhibits a stable but mediocre Piotroski F-Score of 4/9, indicating average financial health. The stock is severely overvalued, trading at $53.39 despite a Graham Number of $15.67 and an Intrinsic Value of $17.70. While YoY revenue and earnings growth are explosive, recent quarterly performance shows a worrying trend of significant earnings misses and a sharp decline in Q/Q EPS growth. Furthermore, the dividend is fundamentally unsustainable with a payout ratio of 166.67%.

Strengths
Exceptional YoY Revenue Growth (101.50%)
Strong Gross Margins (54.48%) and Operating Margins (35.75%)
Robust short-term liquidity with a Current Ratio of 2.54
Risks
Extreme valuation disconnect (P/E of 92.05 vs Sector Avg 30.66)
Unsustainable dividend payout ratio (166.67%)
Recent earnings deterioration with 3 of the last 4 quarters missing estimates

Compare Another Pair

BTU vs GLNG: Head-to-Head Comparison

This page compares Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU) and Golar LNG Limited (GLNG) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.

Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.

Home
Terminal
AI
Markets
Profile