No connection

Search Results

BTU vs PTEN

BTU
Peabody Energy Corporation
BEARISH
Price
$37.96
Market Cap
$4.62B
Sector
Energy
AI Confidence
78%
PTEN
Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc.
BEARISH
Price
$9.42
Market Cap
$3.58B
Sector
Energy
AI Confidence
85%

Valuation

P/E Ratio
BTU
--
PTEN
--
Forward P/E
BTU
10.81
PTEN
-44.19
P/B Ratio
BTU
1.3
PTEN
1.11
P/S Ratio
BTU
1.16
PTEN
0.74
EV/EBITDA
BTU
10.48
PTEN
4.93

Profitability

Gross Margin
BTU
13.85%
PTEN
24.24%
Operating Margin
BTU
-1.84%
PTEN
-2.44%
Profit Margin
BTU
-0.83%
PTEN
-1.94%
ROE
BTU
-0.43%
PTEN
-2.78%
ROA
BTU
0.52%
PTEN
-0.44%

Growth

Revenue Growth
BTU
-7.0%
PTEN
-1.0%
Earnings Growth
BTU
--
PTEN
--

Financial Health

Debt/Equity
BTU
0.11
PTEN
0.4
Current Ratio
BTU
1.99
PTEN
1.64
Quick Ratio
BTU
1.14
PTEN
1.38

Dividends

Dividend Yield
BTU
0.78%
PTEN
4.25%
Payout Ratio
BTU
27.52%
PTEN
213.33%

AI Verdict

BTU BEARISH

The Advanced Deterministic Scorecard reveals severe financial health concerns with a Piotroski F-Score of just 2/9, indicating weak operational and balance sheet performance. Despite a low forward P/E of 10.81 and a strong analyst recommendation of 'strong_buy', the company is unprofitable (negative net and operating margins), has deteriorating earnings (YoY EPS growth of -95.9%), and lacks key valuation benchmarks like a Graham Number or Altman Z-Score due to financial instability. While the balance sheet shows a healthy current ratio and low debt/equity, persistent losses, poor earnings predictability, and negative insider activity undermine any bullish case. The stock's recent price surge (+99.3% in 1Y) appears disconnected from fundamentals, increasing vulnerability to correction.

Strengths
Low forward P/E ratio of 10.81 suggests potential undervaluation relative to earnings capacity
Strong liquidity position with current ratio of 1.99 and quick ratio of 1.14
Minimal leverage with debt/equity ratio of 0.11, reducing solvency risk
Risks
Critically low Piotroski F-Score of 2/9 signals severe financial distress and weak operating performance
Negative profitability across all metrics: net margin (-0.83%), operating margin (-1.84%), and ROE (-0.43%)
Earnings are highly volatile and trending down, with YoY EPS growth of -95.9% and erratic estimate beats
PTEN BEARISH

PTEN exhibits severe fundamental weakness, highlighted by a critical Piotroski F-Score of 2/9, indicating a deteriorating financial position. While the stock has seen a strong 1-year price increase, this is disconnected from operational reality: the company reports negative profit margins and an unsustainable dividend payout ratio of 213.33%. Bearish insider sentiment and negative revenue growth further undermine the bullish analyst consensus. The combination of operational inefficiency and capital mismanagement suggests a high risk of a price correction.

Strengths
Low Debt/Equity ratio (0.40) relative to energy sector average
Healthy liquidity with a Current Ratio of 1.64
Low Price-to-Sales ratio (0.74) suggesting low valuation relative to revenue
Risks
Critical Piotroski F-Score (2/9) signaling poor financial health
Unsustainable dividend payout ratio (213.33%)
Negative profit and operating margins

Compare Another Pair

BTU vs PTEN: Head-to-Head Comparison

This page compares Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU) and Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. (PTEN) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.

Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.

Home
Terminal
AI
Markets
Profile