CCO vs TMUS
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
CCO exhibits severe financial distress, highlighted by a weak Piotroski F-Score of 2/9 and a negative Price-to-Book ratio of -0.35, indicating negative shareholders' equity. While the stock has seen a speculative 1-year price surge of 132%, the underlying fundamentals are precarious with a negative forward P/E and a bearish technical trend (10/100). The disconnect between strong operating margins (25.10%) and thin net profit margins (1.24%) suggests heavy debt servicing costs or significant non-operating losses. Overall, the company appears to be in a high-risk state of financial instability despite modest revenue growth.
TMUS shows neutral fundamentals based on deterministic rules. Financial strength is stable (F-Score 4/9). Mixed signals with both opportunities and risks present.
Compare Another Pair
Related Comparisons
CCO vs TMUS: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. (CCO) and T-Mobile US, Inc. (TMUS) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.