CL vs COST
Valuation
Profitability
Growth
Financial Health
Dividends
AI Verdict
Colgate-Palmolive (CL) trades at a slight discount to sector peers on P/E (21.86 vs 22.17) but faces meaningful headwinds from near-zero revenue growth (1.9% YoY) and deteriorating short-term momentum, with 1Y and 6M returns of -12.6% and -13.4%, respectively. The company maintains elite profitability—Gross Margin of 60.15%, Operating Margin of 20.23%, and ROE of 293.63%—supported by consistent earnings beats over the last 25 quarters, though recent Q/Q EPS growth has turned negative. Elevated leverage (Debt/Equity: 6.80) and weak liquidity (Current Ratio: 0.93) raise structural concerns, while the 2.66% dividend yield offers modest income appeal with a sustainable 57% payout ratio. Analysts are constructive with a $87.26 target implying ~12% upside, but lack of insider activity and stagnant top-line expansion cap near-term catalysts.
COST shows neutral fundamentals based on deterministic rules. Financial strength is stable (F-Score 4/9). Mixed signals with both opportunities and risks present.
Compare Another Pair
CL vs COST: Head-to-Head Comparison
This page compares Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.
Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.