No connection

Search Results

CNQ vs CRGY

CNQ
Canadian Natural Resources Limited
BULLISH
Price
$44.24
Market Cap
$92.32B
Sector
Energy
AI Confidence
85%
CRGY
Crescent Energy Company
NEUTRAL
Price
$12.73
Market Cap
$4.17B
Sector
Energy
AI Confidence
80%

Valuation

P/E Ratio
CNQ
11.73
CRGY
23.57
Forward P/E
CNQ
12.85
CRGY
5.85
P/B Ratio
CNQ
2.84
CRGY
0.81
P/S Ratio
CNQ
2.38
CRGY
1.17
EV/EBITDA
CNQ
7.03
CRGY
5.09

Profitability

Gross Margin
CNQ
48.46%
CRGY
55.65%
Operating Margin
CNQ
19.55%
CRGY
5.46%
Profit Margin
CNQ
27.91%
CRGY
3.71%
ROE
CNQ
25.81%
CRGY
3.51%
ROA
CNQ
5.76%
CRGY
2.93%

Growth

Revenue Growth
CNQ
1.5%
CRGY
-1.2%
Earnings Growth
CNQ
371.8%
CRGY
--

Financial Health

Debt/Equity
CNQ
0.44
CRGY
1.07
Current Ratio
CNQ
0.95
CRGY
1.48
Quick Ratio
CNQ
0.58
CRGY
0.6

Dividends

Dividend Yield
CNQ
4.06%
CRGY
3.77%
Payout Ratio
CNQ
45.54%
CRGY
88.89%

AI Verdict

CNQ BULLISH

CNQ demonstrates exceptional fundamental strength, anchored by a Piotroski F-Score of 8/9 and a superior ROE of 25.81% that dwarfs the sector average. While the current price of $44.24 is slightly above the Graham Number ($36.37), it trades at a massive discount to its growth-based intrinsic value of $111.22. Despite a bearish technical trend (0/100), the company's low P/E ratio and sustainable dividend payout provide a significant margin of safety. The explosive YoY earnings growth suggests high operational efficiency and cost management despite stagnant revenue growth.

Strengths
Strong Piotroski F-Score (8/9) indicating high financial health
Exceptional ROE (25.81%) compared to sector average (1.95%)
Highly attractive valuation with a P/E of 11.73 vs sector average of 34.90
Risks
Severe bearish technical trend (0/100) indicating short-term price pressure
Stagnant YoY revenue growth (1.50%) suggesting a lack of top-line expansion
Current ratio (0.95) is slightly below the ideal 1.0 threshold
CRGY NEUTRAL

CRGY presents a conflicted profile with a Piotroski F-Score of 4/9, indicating stable but mediocre financial health. While the stock trades below its Graham Number ($13.82), suggesting defensive value, it trades at a significant premium to its growth-based intrinsic value ($3.78). Severe year-over-year EPS contraction (-103.8%) and a dangerously high dividend payout ratio (88.89%) offset the bullish analyst consensus and low forward P/E. The technical trend is currently bearish (10/100), suggesting a loss of momentum despite strong 1-year gains.

Strengths
Trading below Graham Number ($13.82), indicating defensive undervaluation
Price-to-Book ratio of 0.81 suggests the stock is undervalued relative to assets
Strong 1-year price performance (+57.3%)
Risks
Severe earnings collapse with YoY EPS growth of -103.8%
Unsustainable dividend payout ratio of 88.89%
Negative revenue growth (-1.20% YoY) indicating stagnation

Compare Another Pair

CNQ vs CRGY: Head-to-Head Comparison

This page compares Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ) and Crescent Energy Company (CRGY) across key fundamental metrics including valuation ratios, profitability margins, growth rates, financial health indicators, and dividend metrics. Each metric highlights the better-performing stock so you can quickly identify relative strengths and weaknesses.

Our AI engine independently analyzes each company's financials, competitive position, and market conditions to produce a verdict (Bullish, Neutral, or Bearish) along with key strengths and risks. Use this comparison alongside your own research to make informed investment decisions.

Home
Terminal
AI Chat
Markets
Profile